Literature DB >> 28056469

Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Emily Buss1, Heather L Porter2, Joseph W Hall1, John H Grose1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The age at which gap detection becomes adultlike differs, depending on the stimulus characteristics. The present study evaluated whether the developmental trajectory differs as a function of stimulus frequency region or duration of the onset and offset ramps bounding the gap. Method: Thresholds were obtained for wideband noise (500-4500 Hz) with 4- or 40-ms raised-cosine ramps and for a 25-Hz-wide low-fluctuation narrowband noise centered on either 500 or 5000 Hz with 40-ms ramps. Stimuli were played continuously at 70 dB SPL, and the task was to indicate which of 3 intervals contained a gap. Listeners were 5.2- to 15.1-year-old children (n = 40) and adults (n = 10) with normal hearing.
Results: Regardless of listener age, gap detection thresholds for the wideband noise tended to be lower when gaps were shaped using 4-ms rather than 40-ms ramps. Thresholds also tended to be lower for the low-fluctuation narrowband noise centered on 5000 Hz than 500 Hz. Performance reached adult levels after 11 years of age for all 4 stimuli. Maturation was not uniform across individuals, however; a subset of young children performed like adults, including some 5-year-olds.
Conclusion: For these stimuli, the developmental trajectory was similar regardless of narrowband noise center frequency or wideband noise onset and offset ramp duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28056469      PMCID: PMC5533555          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  27 in total

1.  A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Lance Nizami; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Authors:  D A Eddins; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frequency discrimination in children: perception, learning and attention.

Authors:  David R Moore; Melanie A Ferguson; Lorna F Halliday; Alison Riley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Gap detection in multiple narrow bands of noise as a function of spectral configuration.

Authors:  J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effects of signal frequency and absolute bandwidth on gap detection in noise.

Authors:  K B Snell; J R Ison; D R Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Monaural temporal integration and temporally selective listening in children and adults.

Authors:  Shuman He; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The relative detectability for mice of gaps having different ramp durations at their onset and offset boundaries.

Authors:  James R Ison; Jason Castro; Paul Allen; Tracy M Virag; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen; Julia Jones Huyck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-02

2.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Emily Buss; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.

Authors:  Stacey G Kane; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.