Literature DB >> 19206879

Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Emily Buss1, Joseph W Hall, John H Grose.   

Abstract

Previous work on pure tone intensity discrimination in school-aged children concluded that children might have higher levels of internal noise than adults for this task [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2777-2788 (2006)]. If true, this would imply that psychometric function slopes are shallower for children than adults, a prediction that was tested in the present experiment. Normal hearing children (5-9 yr) and adults were tested in a two-stage protocol. The first stage used a tracking procedure to estimate 71% correct for intensity discrimination with a gated 500 Hz pure tone and a 65 dB sound pressure level standard level. The mean and standard deviation of these tracks were used to identify a set of five signal levels for each observer. In the second stage of the experiment percent correct was estimated at these five levels. Psychometric functions fitted to these data were significantly shallower for children than adults, as predicted by the internal noise hypothesis. Data from both stages of testing are consistent with a model wherein performance is based on a stable psychometric function, with sensitivity limited by psychometric function slope. Across observers the relationship between slope and threshold conformed closely to predictions of a simple signal detection model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19206879      PMCID: PMC2654578          DOI: 10.1121/1.3050273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

Review 1.  The development of auditory attention in children.

Authors:  H Gomes; S Molholm; C Christodoulou; W Ritter; N Cowan
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2000-01-01

2.  Effects of frequency and duration on psychometric functions for detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids in noise.

Authors:  B C Moore; R W Peters; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychometric functions for level discrimination.

Authors:  S Buus; M Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Development of temporal resolution in children as measured by the temporal modulation transfer function.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of signal and masker uncertainty on children's detection.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

6.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

7.  Spectral weights in level discrimination by preschool children: synthetic listening conditions.

Authors:  M S Willihnganz; M A Stellmack; R A Lutfi; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking.

Authors:  C Abdala; R C Folsom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Infant psychometric functions for detection: mechanisms of immature sensitivity.

Authors:  J Y Bargones; L A Werner; G C Marean
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Maximum-likelihood procedures and the inattentive observer.

Authors:  D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  26 in total

1.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychometric functions for pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Neural Variability Limits Adolescent Skill Learning.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour; James C DiLorenzo; Kiron A Sukesan; Xinyu D Song; Jeff Y Chen; Eleanor A Degen; Katherine L Heisey; Roman Garnett
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

6.  Bayesian active probabilistic classification for psychometric field estimation.

Authors:  Xinyu D Song; Kiron A Sukesan; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Danielle J Zion; Jaclyn R Schurman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 9.  A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.