Literature DB >> 25422994

Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.

Shuman He1, John H Grose, Holly F B Teagle, Jennifer Woodard, Lisa R Park, Debora R Hatch, Patricia Roush, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The overall aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of using electrophysiological measures of the auditory change complex (ACC) to identify candidates for cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). To achieve this overall aim, this study (1) assessed the feasibility of measuring the ACC evoked by temporal gaps in a group of children with ANSD across a wide age range and (2) investigated the association between gap detection thresholds (GDTs) measured by the ACC recordings and open-set speech-perception performance in these subjects.
DESIGN: Nineteen children with bilateral ANSD ranging in age between 1.9 and 14.9 years (mean: 7.8 years) participated in this study. Electrophysiological recordings of the auditory event-related potential (ERP), including the onset ERP response and the ACC, were completed in all subjects and open-set speech perception was evaluated for a subgroup of 16 subjects. For the ERP recordings, the stimulus was a Gaussian noise presented through ER-3A insert earphones to the test ear. Two stimulation conditions were used. In the "control condition," the stimulus was an 800-msec Gaussian noise. In the "gapped condition," the stimuli were two noise segments, each being 400 msec in duration, separated by one of five gaps (i.e., 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100 msec). The interstimulation interval was 1200 msec. The aided open-set speech perception ability was assessed using the Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten (PBK) word lists presented at 60 dB SPL using recorded testing material in a sound booth. For speech perception tests, subjects wore their hearing aids at the settings recommended by their clinical audiologists. For a subgroup of five subjects, psychophysical GDTs for the Gaussian noise were also assessed using a three-interval, three-alternative forced-choice procedure.
RESULTS: Responses evoked by the onset of the Gaussian noise (i.e., onset responses) were recorded in all stimulation conditions from all subjects tested in this study. The presence/absence, peak latency and amplitude, and response width of the onset response did not correlate with aided PBK word scores. The objective GDTs measured with the ACC recordings from 17 subjects ranged from 10 to 100 msec. The ACC was not recorded from two subjects for any gap durations tested in this study. There was a robust negative correlation between objective GDTs and aided PBK word scores. In general, subjects with prolonged objective GDTs showed low-aided PBK word scores. GDTs measured using electrophysiological recordings of the ACC correlated well with those measured using psychophysical procedures in four of five subjects who were evaluated using both procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical application of the onset response in predicting open-set speech-perception ability is relatively limited in children with ANSD. The ACC recordings can be used to objectively evaluate temporal resolution abilities in children with ANSD having no severe comorbidities, and who are older than 1.9 years. The ACC can potentially be used as an objective tool to identify poor performers among children with ANSD using properly fit amplification, and who are thus, cochlear implant candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25422994      PMCID: PMC4409935          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  57 in total

Review 1.  The afferent synapse of cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  Paul A Fuchs; Elisabeth Glowatzki; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  The composite N1 component to gaps in noise.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  N1-p2 recordings to gaps in broadband noise.

Authors:  Shannon B Palmer; Frank E Musiek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 4.  Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues.

Authors:  A Starr; D McPherson; J Patterson; M Don; W Luxford; R Shannon; Y Sininger; L Tonakawa; M Waring
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Screening for auditory neuropathy in a school for hearing impaired children.

Authors:  J S Lee; B McPherson; K C Yuen; L L Wong
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  N Kraus; A R Bradlow; M A Cheatham; J Cunningham; C D King; D B Koch; T G Nicol; T J Mcgee; L K Stein; B A Wright
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-08

7.  Multi-site diagnosis and management of 260 patients with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony (auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder).

Authors:  Charles I Berlin; Linda J Hood; Thierry Morlet; Diane Wilensky; Li Li; Kelly Rose Mattingly; Jennifer Taylor-Jeanfreau; Bronya J B Keats; Patti St John; Elizabeth Montgomery; Jon K Shallop; Benjamin A Russell; Stefan A Frisch
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) performance in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Jennifer B Shinn; Gail D Chermak; Frank E Musiek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Pathology and physiology of auditory neuropathy with a novel mutation in the MPZ gene (Tyr145->Ser).

Authors:  Arnold Starr; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Sharon Fujikawa-Brooks; Fred Linthicum; Chong S Kim; Deidre Winnier; Bronya Keats
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  12 in total

1.  Acoustic Change Complex and Visually Reinforced Infant Speech Discrimination Measures of Vowel Contrast Detection.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone; Spencer Smith; Diane E Cheek Smith
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Relationship Between the Ability to Detect Frequency Changes or Temporal Gaps and Speech Perception Performance in Post-lingual Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Dianzhao Xie; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Jinming Li; Xianqi Liu; Zhaomin Fan; Haibo Wang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cortical Auditory Event-Related Potentials and Categorical Perception of Voice Onset Time in Children With an Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Tyler C McFayden; Paola Baskin; Joseph D W Stephens; Shuman He
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Relationship between objective measures of hearing discrimination elicited by non-linguistic stimuli and speech perception in adults.

Authors:  Hugo Sohier; Fabrice Bardy; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 7.  Acoustic Change Complex: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-12-18

8.  Objective Test of Cochlear Dead Region: Electrophysiologic Approach using Acoustic Change Complex.

Authors:  Soojin Kang; Jihwan Woo; Heesung Park; Carolyn J Brown; Sung Hwa Hong; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chun Liang; Lisa H Wenstrup; Ravi N Samy; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Waves of Change: Brain Sensitivity to Differential, not Absolute, Stimulus Intensity is Conserved Across Humans and Rats.

Authors:  R Somervail; F Zhang; G Novembre; R J Bufacchi; Y Guo; M Crepaldi; L Hu; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.