Literature DB >> 18247902

Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference.

John H Grose1, Emily Buss, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that a detection advantage for gaps in comodulated noise relative to random noise can be demonstrated in conditions of continuous noise and salient envelope fluctuations. Experiment 1 used five 25-Hz-wide bands of Gaussian noise, low-fluctuation noise, and a noise with increased salience of the inherent fluctuations (staccato noise). The bands were centered at 444, 667, 1000, 1500, and 2250 Hz, with the gap signal always inserted in the 1000-Hz band. Results indicated that a gap detection advantage existed in continuous comodulated noise only for Gaussian and staccato noise. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the advantage did not exist for gated presentation. This experiment also showed that the advantage bore some similarity to comodulation masking release. However, differences were also noted in terms of the effects of the number of flanking bands and the absence of a detection advantage in gated conditions. The detrimental effect of a gated flanking band was less pronounced for a comodulated band than for a random band. This study indicates that, under some conditions, a detection advantage for gaps carried by a narrow band of noise can occur in the presence of comodulated flanking bands of noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247902      PMCID: PMC2290824          DOI: 10.1121/1.2828058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Authors:  D A Eddins; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gap detection in multiple narrow bands of noise as a function of spectral configuration.

Authors:  J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cochlear hearing loss and the processing of modulation: effects of temporal asynchrony.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of gating as a function of number of flanking bands and masker bandwidth.

Authors:  D R Hatch; B C Arné; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dichotic interference effects in gap detection.

Authors:  B C Moore; M J Shailer; M J Black
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Gap detection for pairs of noise bands: effects of stimulus level and frequency separation.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose; S Joy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient?

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory development in complex tasks of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose; M B Dev
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Temporal modulation transfer function for efficient assessment of auditory temporal resolution.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Erol J Ozmeral; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.