Literature DB >> 24683290

Misperceptions in Stereoscopic Displays: A Vision Science Perspective.

Robert T Held1, Martin S Banks2.   

Abstract

3d shape and scene layout are often misperceived when viewing stereoscopic displays. For example, viewing from the wrong distance alters an object's perceived size and shape. It is crucial to understand the causes of such misperceptions so one can determine the best approaches for minimizing them. The standard model of misperception is geometric. The retinal images are calculated by projecting from the stereo images to the viewer's eyes. Rays are back-projected from corresponding retinal-image points into space and the ray intersections are determined. The intersections yield the coordinates of the predicted percept. We develop the mathematics of this model. In many cases its predictions are close to what viewers perceive. There are three important cases, however, in which the model fails: 1) when the viewer's head is rotated about a vertical axis relative to the stereo display (yaw rotation); 2) when the head is rotated about a forward axis (roll rotation); 3) when there is a mismatch between the camera convergence and the way in which the stereo images are displayed. In these cases, most rays from corresponding retinal-image points do not intersect, so the standard model cannot provide an estimate for the 3d percept. Nonetheless, viewers in these situations have coherent 3d percepts, so the visual system must use another method to estimate 3d structure. We show that the non-intersecting rays generate vertical disparities in the retinal images that do not arise otherwise. Findings in vision science show that such disparities are crucial signals in the visual system's interpretation of stereo images. We show that a model that incorporates vertical disparities predicts the percepts associated with improper viewing of stereoscopic displays. Improving the model of misperceptions will aid the design and presentation of 3d displays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D displays; Depth perception; Virtual Reality; Visualization

Year:  2008        PMID: 24683290      PMCID: PMC3966488          DOI: 10.1145/1394281.1394285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACM Trans Graph        ISSN: 0730-0301            Impact factor:   5.414


  7 in total

1.  Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception.

Authors:  B T Backus; M S Banks; R van Ee; J A Crowell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis.

Authors:  M S Banks; I T Hooge; B T Backus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Vertical-disparity gradients are processed independently in different depth planes.

Authors:  Philip A Duke; Ian P Howard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces.

Authors:  B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations.

Authors:  J Gårding; J Porrill; J E Mayhew; J P Frisby
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Mark A Helvie; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Justin T Lydick; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Janet E Bailey; Alexis Nees; Caroline E Blane; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Visual Discomfort with Stereo 3D Displays when the Head is Not Upright.

Authors:  David Kane; Robert T Held; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-09

2.  Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Jenny C A Read; Robert S Allison; Simon J Watt
Journal:  SMPTE Motion Imaging J       Date:  2012-05

3.  Perception of 3-D Layout in Stereo Displays.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Robert T Held; Ahna R Girshick
Journal:  Inf Disp (1975)       Date:  2009-01

4.  Perceptual calibration for immersive display environments.

Authors:  Kevin Ponto; Michael Gleicher; Robert G Radwin; Hyun Joon Shin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  Image-size differences worsen stereopsis independent of eye position.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The Role of Vertical Disparity in Distance and Depth Perception as Revealed by Different Stereo-Camera Configurations.

Authors:  Cyril Vienne; Justin Plantier; Pascaline Neveu; Anne-Emmanuelle Priot
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-12-06

8.  Stereoscopic depth constancy.

Authors:  Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  MRI Stereoscope: A Miniature Stereoscope for Human Neuroimaging.

Authors:  I Betina Ip; Ivan Alvarez; Mike Tacon; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-02-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.