Literature DB >> 12678602

Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis.

M S Banks1, I T Hooge, B T Backus.   

Abstract

Rotating a surface about a horizontal axis alters the retinal horizontal-shear disparities. Opposed torsional eye movements (cyclovergence) also change horizontal shear. If there were no compensation for the horizontal disparities created by cyclovergence, slant estimates would be erroneous. We asked whether compensation for cyclovergence occurs, and, if it does, whether it occurs by use of an extraretinal cyclovergence signal, by use of vertical-shear disparities, or by use of both signals. In four experiments, we found that compensation is nearly veridical when vertical-shear disparities are available and easily measured. When they are not available or easily measured, no compensation occurs. Thus, the visual system does not seem to use an extraretinal cyclovergence signal in stereoscopic slant estimation. We also looked for evidence of an extraretinal cyclovergence signal in a visual direction task and found none. We calculated the statistical reliabilities of slant-from-disparity and slant-from-texture estimates and found that the more reliable of the two means of estimation varies significantly with distance and slant. Finally, we examined how slant about a horizontal axis might be estimated when the eyes look eccentrically.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12678602     DOI: 10.1167/1.2.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  12 in total

1.  A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry.

Authors:  M A Mon-Williams; F Mushtaq; R M Wilkie; B Khambay; A Keeling; M Manogue
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Misperceptions in Stereoscopic Displays: A Vision Science Perspective.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Martin S Banks
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Johannes Burge; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Reliability-dependent contributions of visual orientation cues in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Ari Rosenberg; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Shape judgments in natural scenes: Convexity biases versus stereopsis.

Authors:  Brittney Hartle; Aishwarya Sudhama-Joseph; Elizabeth L Irving; Robert S Allison; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Laurie M Wilcox
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.

Authors:  D A Wismeijer; R van Ee; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Optimized but Not Maximized Cue Integration for 3D Visual Perception.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Chang; Lowell Thompson; Raymond Doudlah; Byounghoon Kim; Adhira Sunkara; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-01-08

10.  Latitude and longitude vertical disparities.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.