Literature DB >> 19271878

Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Heather R Filippini1, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Human stereopsis has two well-known constraints: the disparity-gradient limit, which is the inability to perceive depth when the change in disparity within a region is too large, and the limit of stereoresolution, which is the inability to perceive spatial variations in disparity that occur at too fine a spatial scale. We propose that both limitations can be understood as byproducts of estimating disparity by cross-correlating the two eyes' images, the fundamental computation underlying the disparity-energy model. To test this proposal, we constructed a local cross-correlation model with biologically motivated properties. We then compared model and human behaviors in the same psychophysical tasks. The model and humans behaved quite similarly: they both exhibited a disparity-gradient limit and had similar stereoresolution thresholds. Performance was affected similarly by changes in a variety of stimulus parameters. By modeling the effects of stimulus blur and of using different sizes of image patches, we found evidence that the smallest neural mechanism humans use to estimate disparity is 3-6 arcmin in diameter. We conclude that the disparity-gradient limit and stereoresolution are indeed byproducts of using local cross-correlation to estimate disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271878      PMCID: PMC2940423          DOI: 10.1167/9.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  42 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells.

Authors:  A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The physiology of stereopsis.

Authors:  B G Cumming; G C DeAngelis
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Disparity-based coding of three-dimensional surface orientation by macaque middle temporal neurons.

Authors:  Jerry D Nguyenkim; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Misperceptions in Stereoscopic Displays: A Vision Science Perspective.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Martin S Banks
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 5.414

5.  Analysis of disparity gradient based cooperative stereo.

Authors:  Z N Li; G Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Fine-scale processing in human binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  J M Harris; S P McKee; H S Smallman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces.

Authors:  B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Detection of binocular disparities.

Authors:  K Prazdny
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  32 in total

1.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Key characteristics of specular stereo.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The psychophysics of stereopsis can be explained without invoking independent ON and OFF channels.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focused eye.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Geunyoung Yoon; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Development of Relative Disparity Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; Holly E Gerhard; Wesley J Meredith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Image-size differences worsen stereopsis independent of eye position.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.