Literature DB >> 7900308

Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations.

J Gårding1, J Porrill, J E Mayhew, J P Frisby.   

Abstract

The pattern of retinal binocular disparities acquired by a fixating visual system depends on both the depth structure of the scene and the viewing geometry. This paper treats the problem of interpreting the disparity pattern in terms of scene structure without relying on estimates of fixation position from eye movement control and proprioception mechanisms. We propose a sequential decomposition of this interpretation process into disparity correction, which is used to compute three-dimensional structure up to a relief transformation, and disparity normalization, which is used to resolve the relief ambiguity to obtain metric structure. We point out that the disparity normalization stage can often be omitted, since relief transformations preserve important properties such as depth ordering and coplanarity. Based on this framework we analyse three previously proposed computational models of disparity processing; the Mayhew and Longuet-Higgins model, the deformation model and the polar angle disparity model. We show how these models are related, and argue that none of them can account satisfactorily for available psychophysical data. We therefore propose an alternative model, regional disparity correction. Using this model we derive predictions for a number of experiments based on vertical disparity manipulations, and compare them to available experimental data. The paper is concluded with a summary and a discussion of the possible architectures and mechanisms underling stereopsis in the human visual system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7900308     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00162-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

1.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Misperceptions in Stereoscopic Displays: A Vision Science Perspective.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Martin S Banks
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Localization of the plane of regard in space.

Authors:  Ervin Poljac; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Jenny C A Read; Robert S Allison; Simon J Watt
Journal:  SMPTE Motion Imaging J       Date:  2012-05

7.  The precision of binocular and monocular depth judgments in natural settings.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Douglas G Taylor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Probabilistic combination of slant information: weighted averaging and robustness as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Ahna R Girshick; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.