Literature DB >> 7617423

Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces.

B J Rogers1, M F Bradshaw.   

Abstract

Binocular disparity can be defined in a variety of ways and its measurement depends upon the particular coordinate framework chosen. As a result of the inverse square law, binocular disparities need to be scaled by some estimate of absolute distance if they are to be interpreted correctly. The experiments described in this paper investigated the extent to which (i) the vergence angle and (ii) the horizontal gradient of vertical disparities or 'differential perspective' provide the necessary information for judging that a stereoscopic surface is flat and frontoparallel. For small displays (< 20 deg) vergence is more effective than differential perspective in scaling frontoparallel surfaces but for larger displays (> 30 deg), differential perspective plays the major role. When both cues together specify the viewing distance, the constancy of frontoparallel-surface scaling is close to perfect for all sizes of display up to 80 deg. Analysis of the geometry of stereoscopic images shows that when a surface patch lies in a frontal plane, the binocular horizontal size ratio of any surface feature is equal to the square of its binocular vertical size ratio, whatever its distance from the observer.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617423     DOI: 10.1068/p240155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  15 in total

1.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance.

Authors:  J R Tresilian; M Mon-Williams; B M Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Do visual cues contribute to the neural estimate of viewing distance used by the oculomotor system?

Authors:  Min Wei; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Misperceptions in Stereoscopic Displays: A Vision Science Perspective.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Martin S Banks
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 5.414

4.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children.

Authors:  Marko Nardini; Rachael Bedford; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Emily A Cooper; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Effect of vertical disparities on depth representation in macaque monkeys: MT physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Syed A Chowdhury; Daniel L Christiansen; Michael L Morgan; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Latitude and longitude vertical disparities.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.