Literature DB >> 24682333

Oral perceptual discrimination of viscosity differences for non-newtonian liquids in the nectar- and honey-thick ranges.

Catriona M Steele1, David F James, Sarah Hori, Rebecca C Polacco, Clemence Yee.   

Abstract

Thickened liquids are frequently used in the management of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Previous studies suggest that compression of a liquid bolus between the tongue and the palate in the oral phase of swallowing serves a sensory function, enabling the tuning of motor behavior to match the viscosity of the bolus. However, the field lacks information regarding healthy oral sensory discrimination ability for small differences in liquid viscosity. We undertook to measure oral viscosity discrimination ability for five non-Newtonian xanthan gum-thickened liquids in the nectar- and honey-thick range. Xanthan gum concentration ranged from 0.5 to 0.87 % and increased by an average of 0.1 % between stimuli in the array. This translated to an average apparent viscosity increase of 0.2-fold between adjacent stimuli at 50 reciprocal seconds (/s). A triangle test paradigm was used to study stimulus discrimination in 78 healthy adults in two, sex-balanced age cohorts. Participants were provided 5-ml samples of liquids in sets of three; one liquid differed in xanthan gum concentration from the other two. Participants were required to sample the liquid orally and indicate which sample was perceived to have a different viscosity. A protocol of 20 sets (60 samples) allowed calculation of the minimum difference in xanthan gum concentration detected accurately. On average, participants were able to accurately detect a 0.38-fold increase in xanthan-gum concentration, translating to a 0.67-fold increase in apparent viscosity at 50/s. The data did not suggest the existence of a nonlinear point boundary in apparent viscosity within the range tested. No differences in viscosity discrimination were found between age cohorts or as a function of sex. The data suggest that for xanthan gum-thickened liquids, there may be several increments of detectably different viscosity within the ranges currently proposed for nectar- and honey-thick liquids. If physiological or functional differences in swallowing can be demonstrated for these smaller increments of detectably different viscosity, more narrowly defined categories of thickened liquids for dysphagia management will be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682333      PMCID: PMC4062812          DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9518-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  18 in total

1.  Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination.

Authors:  Samantha Lau; Michael O'Mahony; Benoît Rousseau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-04

2.  Statistical comparison of the triangle test and the two-of-five test for taste and odor evaluation.

Authors:  D L Gallagher
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Searching for meaningful differences in viscosity.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Viscosity measurements of nectar- and honey-thick liquids: product, liquid, and time comparisons.

Authors:  Jane Mertz Garcia; Edgar Chambers; Ziad Matta; Megan Clark
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Thickened liquids: practice patterns of speech-language pathologists.

Authors:  Jane Mertz Garcia; Edgar Chambers; Michelle Molander
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Thickener viscosity in dysphagia management: variability among speech-language pathologists.

Authors:  D L Glassburn; J F Deem
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Triadic discrimination testing: refinement of Thurstonian and sequential sensitivity analysis approaches.

Authors:  S Tedja; R Nonaka; D M Ennis; M O'Mahony
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Determination of the taste threshold of copper in water.

Authors:  I Zacarías; C G Yáñez; M Araya; C Oraka; M Olivares; R Uauy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Oral sensory discrimination of fluid viscosity.

Authors:  C H Smith; J A Logemann; W R Burghardt; T D Carrell; S G Zecker
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Effects of saliva on starch-thickened drinks with acidic and neutral pH.

Authors:  Ben Hanson; Ben Cox; Efstathios Kaliviotis; Christina H Smith
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  9 in total

1.  The influence of tongue strength on oral viscosity discrimination acuity.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele
Journal:  J Texture Stud       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  A Systematic Process for Weaning Children With Aspiration From Thickened Fluids.

Authors:  Nikolaus E Wolter; Kayla Hernandez; Alexandria L Irace; Kathryn Davidson; Jennifer A Perez; Kara Larson; Reza Rahbar
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Age and strength influences on lingual tactile acuity.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Lisa Hill; Shauna Stokely; Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon
Journal:  J Texture Stud       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Elucidation of a lingual detection mechanism for high-viscosity solutions in humans.

Authors:  Brittany L Miles; Zhenxing Wu; Kelly S Kennedy; Kai Zhao; Christopher T Simons
Journal:  Food Funct       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.396

5.  Combining Liquid Oral Drugs with Thickener: Compatibility and Changes in Viscosity.

Authors:  Patricia Bravo-José; Carmen Sáez-LLeó; Elena Moreno-Guillamont
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 6.  The influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Woroud Abdulrahman Alsanei; Sona Ayanikalath; Carly E A Barbon; Jianshe Chen; Julie A Y Cichero; Kim Coutts; Roberto O Dantas; Janice Duivestein; Lidia Giosa; Ben Hanson; Peter Lam; Caroline Lecko; Chelsea Leigh; Ahmed Nagy; Ashwini M Namasivayam; Weslania V Nascimento; Inge Odendaal; Christina H Smith; Helen Wang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Institutionalized elderly are able to detect small viscosity variations in thickened water with gum-based thickeners: should texture classifications be reviewed?

Authors:  Fernando Calmarza-Chueca; Ana Cristina-Sánchez-Gimeno; Javier Perez-Nogueras; Alberto Caverni-Muñoz; Alejandro Sanz-Arque; José Miguel Arbones-Mainar; Alejandro Sanz-Paris
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Variations in tongue-palate swallowing pressures when swallowing xanthan gum-thickened liquids.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Sonja M Molfenter; Melanie Péladeau-Pigeon; Rebecca C Polacco; Clemence Yee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Oral Sensitivity to Flowability and Food Neophobia Drive Food Preferences and Choice.

Authors:  Sharon Puleo; Paolo Masi; Silvana Cavella; Rossella Di Monaco
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.