Literature DB >> 15283071

Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination.

Samantha Lau1, Michael O'Mahony, Benoît Rousseau.   

Abstract

In order to provide insights into why discrimination protocols with three stimuli sometimes tend to be less sensitive than protocols with two stimuli, two experiments were conducted. In these experiments, the relative effects of memory decay and memory interference were investigated. Both experiments involved purified water and/or solutions of low NaCl concentration. In Experiment 1, three protocols were compared: the traditional same-different test (Protocol 1), the same protocol with a rinse between the two samples (Protocol 2), and Protocol 2 with an added time delay between the first sample and the intermediate rinse (Protocol 3.) The decrease in measured d' values as time delay increased indicated that memory decay might be a factor for tests with three stimuli, such as the triangle method, rendering it less sensitive than tests with two stimuli, such as the same-different method. In Experiment 2, four protocols were compared: the traditional same-different test, the two-rinse same-different test, the triangle test, and what will be called duo same-different test. The experimental design allowed the individual consideration of memory decay and interference effects. From this last experiment, the substantial effect of memory interference was uncovered. Further experimentation will be necessary to estimate the exact relative effects of memory interference and memory decay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15283071     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  3 in total

1.  Oral perceptual discrimination of viscosity differences for non-newtonian liquids in the nectar- and honey-thick ranges.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; David F James; Sarah Hori; Rebecca C Polacco; Clemence Yee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  A cortical pathway to olfactory naming: evidence from primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Emily Rogalski; Theresa Harrison; M-Marsel Mesulam; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  A transfer of technology from engineering: use of ROC curves from signal detection theory to investigate information processing in the brain during sensory difference testing.

Authors:  Sukanya Wichchukit; Michael O'Mahony
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.167

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.