Literature DB >> 11124219

Determination of the taste threshold of copper in water.

I Zacarías1, C G Yáñez, M Araya, C Oraka, M Olivares, R Uauy.   

Abstract

Copper effects on human health represent a relevant issue in modern nutrition. One of the difficulties in assessing the early, acute effects of copper ingested via drinking water is that the taste of copper may influence the response and the capacity to taste copper in different waters is unknown. The purpose of the study was to determine the taste threshold of copper in different types of water, using soluble and insoluble salts (copper sulfate and copper chloride). Copper-containing solutions (range 1.0-8.0 mg/l Cu) were prepared in tap water, distilled deionized water and uncarbonated mineral water. Sixty-one healthy volunteers (17-50 years of age), with no previous training for sensory evaluation, participated in the study. A modified triangle test was used to define the taste threshold value. The threshold was defined as the lowest copper concentration detected by 50% of the subjects assessed. To evaluate the olfactory input in the threshold value obtained, 15 of 61 subjects underwent a second set of triangle tests with the nose open and clamped, using distilled water with copper sulfate at a concentration corresponding to the individual's threshold. The taste threshold in tap water was 2.6 mg/l Cu for both copper sulfate and copper chloride. The corresponding values for distilled deionized water were 2.4 and 2.5 mg/l Cu for copper sulfate and copper chloride, respectively. In uncarbonated mineral water the threshold values were slightly higher, 3.5 and 3.8 mg/l Cu for copper sulfate and for copper chloride, respectively, which are significantly higher than those observed in tap and distilled waters (P < 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). The taste threshold did not change significantly when the nose was clamped. In conclusion, the median values for copper taste threshold were low, ranging between 2.4 and 3.8 mg/l Cu, depending on the type of water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11124219     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/26.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  7 in total

1.  Oral perceptual discrimination of viscosity differences for non-newtonian liquids in the nectar- and honey-thick ranges.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; David F James; Sarah Hori; Rebecca C Polacco; Clemence Yee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Effects of Nasal Occlusion and Oral Contact on Perception of Metallic Taste from Metal Salts.

Authors:  Effie M Epke; Scott T McClure; Harry T Lawless
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF DIVALENT SALTS.

Authors:  Heidi Hai-Ling Yang; Harry T Lawless
Journal:  J Sens Stud       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Retronasal smell and detection thresholds of iron and copper salts.

Authors:  Effie M Epke; Harry T Lawless
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-24

Review 5.  Copper Corrosion and Biocorrosion Events in Premise Plumbing.

Authors:  Ignacio T Vargas; Diego A Fischer; Marco A Alsina; Juan P Pavissich; Pablo A Pastén; Gonzalo E Pizarro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Taste Perception of Nutrients Found in Nutritional Supplements: A Review.

Authors:  Thomas Delompré; Elisabeth Guichard; Loïc Briand; Christian Salles
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Heavy Metal Pollution of Chari River Water during the Crossing of N'Djamena (Chad).

Authors:  N'garam Nambatingar; Yohann Clement; Alain Merle; Tchadanaye New Mahamat; Pierre Lanteri
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2017-10-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.