Literature DB >> 26689307

Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search.

Nicole L Jardine1, Cathleen M Moore1.   

Abstract

Representing temporally continuous objects across change (e.g., in position) requires integration of newly sampled visual information with existing object representations. We asked what consequences representational updating has for visual search. In this dynamic visual search task, bars rotated around their central axis. Observers searched for a single episodic target state (oblique bar among vertical and horizontal bars). Search was efficient when the target display was presented as an isolated static display. Performance declined to near chance, however, when the same display was a single state of a dynamically changing scene (Experiment 1), as though temporal selection of the target display from the stream of stimulation failed entirely (Experiment 3). The deficit is attributable neither to masking (Experiment 2), nor to a lack of temporal marker for the target display (Experiment 4). The deficit was partially reduced by visually marking the target display with unique feature information (Experiment 5). We suggest that representational updating causes a loss of access to instantaneous state information in search. Similar to spatially crowded displays that are perceived as textures (Parkes, Lund, Angelucci, Solomon, & Morgan, 2001), we propose a temporal version of the trees (instantaneous orientation information) being lost for the forest (rotating bars). (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26689307      PMCID: PMC4840043          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  66 in total

1.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Chelsea Heaven
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Selective temporal attention enhances the temporal resolution of visual perception: Evidence from a temporal order judgment task.

Authors:  Angel Correa; Daniel Sanabria; Charles Spence; Pío Tudela; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  A new type of change blindness: smooth, isoluminant color changes are monitored on a coarse spatial scale.

Authors:  Erin Goddard; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual motion and attentional capture.

Authors:  A P Hillstrom; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-04

Review 7.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.