Jing Liu1, David Saloner1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA ; 2 Radiology Service, VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study proposes and evaluates a novel method for generating efficient undersampling patterns for 3D Cartesian acquisition with compressed sensing (CS) and parallel imaging (PI). METHODS: Image quality achieved with schemes that accelerate data acquisition, including CS and PI, are sensitive to the design of the specific undersampling scheme used. Ideally random sampling is required to recover MR images from undersampled data with CS. In practice, pseudo-random sampling schemes are usually applied. Radial or spiral sampling either for Cartesian or non-Cartesian acquisitions has been using because of its favorable features such as interleaving flexibility. In this study, we propose to undersample data on the ky-kz plane of the 3D Cartesian acquisition by circularly selecting sampling points in a way that maintains the features of both random and radial or spiral sampling. RESULTS: The proposed sampling scheme is shown to outperform conventional random and radial or spiral samplings for 3D Cartesian acquisition and is found to be comparable to advanced variable-density Poisson-Disk sampling (vPDS) while retaining interleaving flexibility for dynamic imaging, based on the results with retrospective undersampling. Our preliminary results with the prospective implementation of the proposed undersampling strategy demonstrated its favorable features. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed undersampling patterns for 3D Cartesian acquisition possess the desirable properties of randomization and radial or spiral trajectories. It provides easy implementation, flexible sampling, and high accuracy of image reconstruction with CS and PI.
PURPOSE: This study proposes and evaluates a novel method for generating efficient undersampling patterns for 3D Cartesian acquisition with compressed sensing (CS) and parallel imaging (PI). METHODS: Image quality achieved with schemes that accelerate data acquisition, including CS and PI, are sensitive to the design of the specific undersampling scheme used. Ideally random sampling is required to recover MR images from undersampled data with CS. In practice, pseudo-random sampling schemes are usually applied. Radial or spiral sampling either for Cartesian or non-Cartesian acquisitions has been using because of its favorable features such as interleaving flexibility. In this study, we propose to undersample data on the ky-kz plane of the 3D Cartesian acquisition by circularly selecting sampling points in a way that maintains the features of both random and radial or spiral sampling. RESULTS: The proposed sampling scheme is shown to outperform conventional random and radial or spiral samplings for 3D Cartesian acquisition and is found to be comparable to advanced variable-density Poisson-Disk sampling (vPDS) while retaining interleaving flexibility for dynamic imaging, based on the results with retrospective undersampling. Our preliminary results with the prospective implementation of the proposed undersampling strategy demonstrated its favorable features. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed undersampling patterns for 3D Cartesian acquisition possess the desirable properties of randomization and radial or spiral trajectories. It provides easy implementation, flexible sampling, and high accuracy of image reconstruction with CS and PI.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jing Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Noel C F Codella; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Clifton R Haider; Houchun Harry Hu; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mario O Malavé; Corey A Baron; Srivathsan P Koundinyan; Christopher M Sandino; Frank Ong; Joseph Y Cheng; Dwight G Nishimura Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Li Feng; Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Hersh Chandarana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jing Liu; Louise Koskas; Farshid Faraji; Evan Kao; Yan Wang; Henrik Haraldsson; Sarah Kefayati; Chengcheng Zhu; Sinyeob Ahn; Gerhard Laub; David Saloner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Grant T Gullberg; Alexander I Veress; Uttam M Shrestha; Jing Liu; Karen Ordovas; W Paul Segars; Youngho Seo Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2019-05-28
Authors: Peng Cao; Jing Liu; Shuyu Tang; Andrew P Leynes; Janine M Lupo; Duan Xu; Peder E Z Larson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-08-31 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jing Liu; Li Feng; Hsin-Wei Shen; Chengcheng Zhu; Yan Wang; Kanae Mukai; Gabriel C Brooks; Karen Ordovas; David Saloner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 2.310