Literature DB >> 31396973

Technical Note: Simultaneous segmentation and relaxometry for MRI through multitask learning.

Peng Cao1, Jing Liu1, Shuyu Tang1, Andrew P Leynes1, Janine M Lupo1, Duan Xu1, Peder E Z Larson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study demonstrated a magnetic resonance (MR) signal multitask learning method for three-dimensional (3D) simultaneous segmentation and relaxometry of human brain tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D inversion-prepared balanced steady-state free precession sequence was used for acquiring in vivo multicontrast brain images. The deep neural network contained three residual blocks, and each block had 8 fully connected layers with sigmoid activation, layer norm, and 256 neurons in each layer. Online-synthesized MR signal evolutions and labels were used to train the neural network batch-by-batch. Empirically defined ranges of T1 and T2 values for the normal gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were used as the prior knowledge. MRI brain experiments were performed on three healthy volunteers. The mean and standard deviation for the T1 and T2 values in vivo were reported and compared to literature values. Additional animal (N = 6) and prostate patient (N = 1) experiments were performed to compare the estimated T1 and T2 values with those from gold standard methods and to demonstrate clinical applications of the proposed method.
RESULTS: In animal validation experiment, the differences/errors (mean difference ± standard deviation of difference) between the T1 and T2 values estimated from the proposed method and the ground truth were 113 ± 486 and 154 ± 512 ms for T1, and 5 ± 33 and 7 ± 41 ms for T2, respectively. In healthy volunteer experiments (N = 3), whole brain segmentation and relaxometry were finished within ~ 5 s. The estimated apparent T1 and T2 maps were in accordance with known brain anatomy, and not affected by coil sensitivity variation. Gray matter, white matter, and CSF were successfully segmented. The deep neural network can also generate synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images.
CONCLUSION: The proposed multitask learning method can directly generate brain apparent T1 and T2 maps, as well as synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images, in conjunction with segmentation of gray matter, white matter, and CSF.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR fingerprinting; brain segmentation; deep neural network; gray matter; machine learning; relaxometry; white matter

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31396973      PMCID: PMC6800607          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.

Authors:  Y Zhang; M Brady; S Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Inversion recovery TrueFISP: quantification of T(1), T(2), and spin density.

Authors:  Peter Schmitt; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Markus Kotas; Vikas Gulani; Michael Flentje; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Quantitative analysis in clinical applications of brain MRI using independent component analysis coupled with support vector machine.

Authors:  Jyh-Wen Chai; Clayton Chi-Chang Chen; Chih-Ming Chiang; Yung-Jen Ho; Hsian-Min Chen; Yen-Chieh Ouyang; Ching-Wen Yang; San-Kan Lee; Chein-I Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging.

Authors:  Hendrikus J A Crooijmans; Monika Gloor; Oliver Bieri; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Finite RF pulse correction on DESPOT2.

Authors:  H J A Crooijmans; K Scheffler; O Bieri
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Partial volume tissue classification of multichannel magnetic resonance images-a mixel model.

Authors:  H S Choi; D R Haynor; Y Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  MR fingerprinting Deep RecOnstruction NEtwork (DRONE).

Authors:  Ouri Cohen; Bo Zhu; Matthew S Rosen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Three-dimensional T(1), T(2) and proton density mapping with inversion recovery balanced SSFP.

Authors:  Rexford D Newbould; Stefan T Skare; Marcus T Alley; Garry E Gold; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Authors:  Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Application of quantitative MRI for brain tissue segmentation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths.

Authors:  Janne West; Ida Blystad; Maria Engström; Jan B M Warntjes; Peter Lundberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: from evolution to clinical applications.

Authors:  Jean J L Hsieh; Imants Svalbe
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-06-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.