Literature DB >> 24609846

Development and validation of the biobanking attitudes and knowledge survey (BANKS).

Kristen J Wells1, Mariana Arevalo, Cathy D Meade, Clement K Gwede, Gwendolyn P Quinn, John S Luque, Gloria San Miguel, Dale Watson, Rebecca Phillips, Carmen Reyes, Margarita Romo, Jim West, Paul B Jacobsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No validated multiscale instruments exist that measure community members' views on biobanking and biospecimen donation. This study describes the development and psychometric properties of the English-language BANKS (Biobanking Attitudes and Knowledge Survey).
METHODS: The BANKS was created by item generation through review of scientific literature, focus groups with community members, and input from a community advisory board. Items were refined through cognitive interviews. Content validity was assessed through an expert panel review. Psychometric properties of the BANKS were assessed in a sample of 85 community members.
RESULTS: The final BANKS includes three scales: attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy; as well as three single items, which evaluated receptivity and intention to donate a biospecimen for research. Cronbach α coefficients for two scales that use Likert response format indicated high internal consistency (attitudes: α, 0.88; self-efficacy: α, 0.95). Content validity indices were moderate, ranging from 0.69 to 0.89. Intention to donate blood and intention to donate urine were positively correlated with attitudes, knowledge, self-efficacy, and receptivity to learning more about biobanking (P values range from 0.029 to <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The final BANKS shows evidence of satisfactory reliability and validity, is easy to administer, and is a promising tool to inform biospecimen research. Additional studies should be conducted with larger samples considering biospecimen donation to further assess the reliability and validity of the instrument. IMPACT: A valid and reliable instrument measuring community members' views about biobanking may help researchers evaluate relevant communication interventions to enhance understanding, intention, and actual biospecimen donation. A Spanish-language BANKS is under development. ©2014 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24609846      PMCID: PMC3955026          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  33 in total

1.  Lack of oversight in tissue donation raising concerns.

Authors:  Sandra Blakeslee
Journal:  N Y Times Web       Date:  2002-01-20

Review 2.  Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies.

Authors:  Keith Bauer; Sara Taub; Kayhan Parsi
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

3.  Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey.

Authors:  Christine R Critchley; Dianne Nicol; Margaret F A Otlowski; Mark J A Stranger
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Human tissue samples and ethics--attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research.

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Göran Hermerén
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

5.  The Tuskegee Legacy Project: willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; S Steven Kegeles; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Sherman A James; Stefanie Luise Russell; Cristina Claudio
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2006-11

6.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

Authors:  John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study.

Authors:  Virgilia Toccaceli; Corrado Fagnani; Lorenza Nisticò; Cristina D'Ippolito; Lorenzo Giannantonio; Sonia Brescianini; Maria Antonietta Stazi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.

Authors:  A Cambon-Thomsen; E Rial-Sebbag; B M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion.

Authors:  Cathy D Meade; Janelle M Menard; John S Luque; Dinorah Martinez-Tyson; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-10-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank.

Authors:  Jenna van Draanen; Pamela Davidson; Helene Bour-Jordan; LeeAnna Bowman-Carpio; David Boyle; Steve Dubinett; Brian Gardner; Jachael Gardner; Courtney McFall; Dan Mercola; Terry Nakazono; Stephanie Soares; Hubert Stoppler; Margaret Tempero; Scott Vandenberg; Yu Jui Wan; Sarah Dry
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Rodney Haring; Elisa M Rodriguez; Evelyn González; Judith S Kaur; Marcie Kirschner; Laura Tom; Catherine A O'Brian; Mira L Katz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Development and validation of the biobanking attitudes and knowledge survey-Spanish (BANKS-SP).

Authors:  Mariana Arevalo; Paul B Jacobsen; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Gwendolyn P Quinn; John S Luque; Gloria San Miguel; Dale Watson; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-09-15

4.  Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sharon H Baik; Mariana Arevalo; Clement Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Comparison of Health Communication Channels for Reaching Hispanics About Biobanking: a Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Jessica McIntyre; Julio Jiménez; Yonaira M Rivera; Steven K Sutton; Gloria Asencio; Eida M Castro-Figueroa; Clement K Gwede; Thomas H Brandon; Susan T Vadaparampil; Vani N Simmons; Johanna Corchado; Laura Moreno; Kristen J Wells; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Introducing Biospecimen Science to Communities: Tools from Two Cities.

Authors:  Cathy D Meade; Elisa M Rodriguez; Mariana Arevalo; John S Luque; Narseary Harris; Gloria San Miguel; Clement K Gwede; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015

7.  Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physicians towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Douaa M Sayed; Walaa A Khairy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Giving samples or "getting checked": measuring conflation of observational biospecimen research and clinical care in Latino communities.

Authors:  Sarah Knerr; Rachel M Ceballos
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Development of a questionnaire to evaluate patients' awareness of cardiovascular disease risk in England's National Health Service Health Check preventive cardiovascular programme.

Authors:  Maria Woringer; Jessica Jones Nielsen; Lara Zibarras; Julie Evason; Angelos P Kassianos; Matthew Harris; Azeem Majeed; Michael Soljak
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.