Literature DB >> 21927867

Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

John S Luque1, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Francisco A Montel-Ishino, Mariana Arevalo, Shalanda A Bynum, Shalewa Noel-Thomas, Kristen J Wells, Clement K Gwede, Cathy D Meade.   

Abstract

Preparing healthy community members with timely communications prior to engaging them in a request to donate biospecimens promises to improve the experience of biobanking participation. To this end, a qualitative study was conducted to assess community member knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and informational needs about cancer-related biospecimen collection in a large metropolitan area in southwest Florida. The study utilized purposive sampling techniques to recruit a total of 95 participants to participate in 12 focus groups, segmented by race/ethnicity and language preference (mixed race, African American only, and Spanish speaking) and age (18-29, 30-54, and 55 and older). Focus group interviews were analyzed using content analysis to identify emergent themes. Overall, participants in the 30 years and older groups were favorable toward participating in biobanking if their concerns were addressed, such as confidentiality and consent issues, in contrast to participants aged 18-29 who were more skeptical. For all participants, the desire to participate in research that seeks new cancer treatments outweighed mistrust. Moreover, many cited the potential scientific benefit for future generations as a primary motivator. Finally, in some groups a therapeutic misconception was expressed, where participants expressed a willingness to forego confidentiality of their health status in exchange for therapeutic benefit. This study contributes to the literature on community perceptions of the benefits and barriers of biobanking and adds to the development of meaningful education communication priming tools to advance understandings about biobanking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21927867      PMCID: PMC3735437          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0275-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  35 in total

1.  The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?

Authors:  Dave Wendler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-08

2.  Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of records.

Authors:  Alison L Jack; Christopher Womack
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-02

3.  Cancer care for diverse populations: relevant communications and research.

Authors:  Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 4.  The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Robert Millikan; Julian Little; Marta Gwinn
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: a brief review of existing organizational policies.

Authors:  Keith Bauer; Sara Taub; Kayhan Parsi
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

6.  Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.

Authors:  Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum; Thomas Grisso; Michelle Renaud
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Accountability in population biobanking: comparative approaches.

Authors:  Mylène Deschênes; Clémentine Sallée
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Bert-Ove Olofsson; Tom Mjörndal; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-10

Review 9.  Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; M Wensing; K Hood; C Atwell; R Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

10.  A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research.

Authors:  M L Goodson; B G Vernon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.

Authors:  Nicole J Caixeiro; Hei Lan Byun; Joseph Descallar; Janelle V Levesque; Paul de Souza; Cheok Soon Lee
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  [Behavioral Medicine, Health Psychology and Psycho-oncology Puerto Rican Graduated Students Research Training Needs].

Authors:  Emely Pérez Ramírez; Normarie Torres Blasco; Olga Garduño Ortega; Eida Castro; Rosario Costas Muñiz
Journal:  Rev Puertorriquena Psicol       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

3.  Predictors of biospecimen donation in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Chiranjeev Dash; Julie R Palmer; Manuela V Wiedemeier; Cordelia W Russell; Lynn Rosenberg; Yvette C Cozier
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03

5.  Factors associated with willingness to provide biospecimens for genetics research among African American cancer survivors.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Nnenna Kalu; Gloria Cain; Lori H Erby; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; Eva Tetteyfio-Kidd Telemaque; Denise M Scott
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-14

6.  A Community-Driven Intervention for Improving Biospecimen Donation in African American Communities.

Authors:  Kushal Patel; Wendelyn Inman; Jemal Gishe; Owen Johnson; Elizabeth Brown; Mohamed Kanu; Rosemary Theriot; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela Hull; Margaret Hargreaves
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-02-08

Review 7.  Biobanking for research in surgery: are surgeons in charge for advancing translational research or mere assistants in biomaterial and data preservation?

Authors:  Wolfgang E Thasler; Reinhard M K Thasler; Celine Schelcher; Karl-Walter Jauch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Knowledge and willingness to provide research biospecimens among foreign-born Latinos using safety-net clinics.

Authors:  Christopher A Loffredo; Gheorghe Luta; Sherrie Wallington; Solomon B Makgoeng; Claire Selsky; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08

9.  Factors associated with participation by African Americans in a study of the genetics of glaucoma.

Authors:  Rupin Parikh; Laura O'Keefe; Rebecca Salowe; Makayla Mccoskey; Wei Pan; Prithvi Sankar; Eydie Miller-Ellis; Victoria Addis; Amanda Lehman; Maureen Maguire; Joan O'Brien
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  A trade secret model for genomic biobanking.

Authors:  John M Conley; Robert Mitchell; R Jean Cadigan; Arlene M Davis; Allison W Dobson; Ryan Q Gladden
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.