Literature DB >> 27627979

Development and validation of the biobanking attitudes and knowledge survey-Spanish (BANKS-SP).

Mariana Arevalo1, Paul B Jacobsen2,3, Clement K Gwede2,3, Cathy D Meade2,3, Gwendolyn P Quinn2,3, John S Luque4, Gloria San Miguel5, Dale Watson6, Kristen J Wells7,8.   

Abstract

Few research studies with non-English-speaking audiences have been conducted to explore community members' views on biospecimen donation and banking, and no validated Spanish-language multi-scale instruments exist to measure community perspectives on biobanking. This study describes the development and psychometric properties of the Biobanking Attitudes aNd Knowledge Survey-Spanish (BANKS-SP). The BANKS was translated into Spanish using the Brislin method of translation. Draft BANKS-SP items were refined through cognitive interviews, and psychometric properties were assessed in a sample of 85 Spanish-speaking individuals recruited at various community events in a three county area in central west Florida, USA. The final BANKS-SP includes three scales: attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy; as well as three single items, which evaluated receptivity and intention to donate a biospecimen for research. The final Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the two scales that use a Likert response format indicated adequate internal consistency (attitudes, α = .79; self-efficacy, α = .91). Intention to donate blood and intention to donate urine were positively correlated with attitudes, self-efficacy, and receptivity to learning more about biobanking (all p's < .001). BANKS-SP-Knowledge was not statistically significantly correlated with other BANKS-SP scales or single items measuring intention to donate a biospecimen for research and receptivity for learning more about biospecimen research. The BANKS-SP attitudes and self-efficacy scales show evidence of satisfactory reliability and validity. Additional research should be conducted with larger samples to assess the BANKS-SP instrument's reliability and validity. A valid and reliable Spanish-language instrument measuring Spanish-speaking community members' views about biobanking may help researchers evaluate relevant communication interventions to enhance understanding, intention, and actual biospecimen donation among this population.

Keywords:  Biospecimen; Questionnaire; Reliability; Self-efficacy; Tissue banking; Validity

Year:  2016        PMID: 27627979      PMCID: PMC5138166          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0280-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  17 in total

1.  Disparities in knowledge and willingness to donate research biospecimens: a mixed-methods study in an underserved urban community.

Authors:  Chiranjeev Dash; Sherrie F Wallington; Sherieda Muthra; Everett Dodson; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-04-26

2.  Association of acculturation, nativity, and years living in the United States with biobanking among individuals of Mexican descent.

Authors:  David S Lopez; Maria E Fernandez; Miguel Angel Cano; Claudia Mendez; Chu-Lin Tsai; David W Wetter; Sara S Strom
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Community-based partnership to identify keys to biospecimen research participation.

Authors:  Deborah O Erwin; Kirsten Moysich; Marc T Kiviniemi; Frances G Saad-Harfouche; Warren Davis; Nikia Clark-Hargrave; Gregory L Ciupak; Christine B Ambrosone; Charles Walker
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

Authors:  John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Cancer patient perceptions about biobanking and preferred timing of consent.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Joann U Tsark; Amy Powers; Kristen Croom; Robert Kim; Francine C Gachupin; Paul Morris
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion.

Authors:  Cathy D Meade; Janelle M Menard; John S Luque; Dinorah Martinez-Tyson; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-10-12

7.  Improving diversity in cancer research trials: the story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Erika E de la Riva; Raymond Bergan; Carrie Norbeck; June M McKoy; Piotr Kulesza; XinQi Dong; Julian Schink; Linda Fleisher
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community.

Authors:  Elisa Marie Rodriguez; Essie T Torres; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-06-04

9.  Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Maryam Husamudeen; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Giving samples or "getting checked": measuring conflation of observational biospecimen research and clinical care in Latino communities.

Authors:  Sarah Knerr; Rachel M Ceballos
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish.

Authors:  Sharon H Baik; Mariana Arevalo; Clement Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.