Literature DB >> 17666560

Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.

A Cambon-Thomsen1, E Rial-Sebbag, B M Knoppers.   

Abstract

Numerous studies of genetic epidemiology and post-genomics in respiratory diseases rely on the use of biobanks, defined as organised biological sample collections with associated personal and clinical data. The use of biobanks is increasing and raises several ethical issues. What are the ethical trends and legal frameworks in the post-genomic era? Are there new issues in relation to the developments of techniques and new study designs? How does this affect the clinician's attitudes and relationship with the patients? The main ethical issues encountered are: informed consent; confidentiality; secondary use of samples and data over time; return of results; and data sharing. Different levels and modalities of dealing with such issues are identified and vary from legally binding measures to "soft" regulations, such as ethical recommendations by various committees or professional organisations. A further level of complexity appears with the increasing international dimension of such activities in a context in which national positions vary on those topics. There is a tension between a necessary level of diversity in ethical positions and an indispensable common pedestal of principles and procedures to manage these issues in order to foster research. Current legal and ethical trends favour the facilitation of secondary use of samples, more biobank openness, balanced with a growing attention to dialogue and public/stakeholder consultation, an increased role for research ethics committees and more sophisticated data protection and governance structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17666560     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00165006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  72 in total

1.  Stem cell banking: between traceability and identifiability.

Authors:  Bartha M Knoppers; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Biobank governance: heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Georg Lauss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 3.  Bioethical considerations in developing a biorepository for the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health project.

Authors:  Andrea N DeLuca; Alan Regenberg; Jeremy Sugarman; David R Murdoch; Orin Levine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation.

Authors:  George Gaskell; Herbert Gottweis; Johannes Starkbaum; Monica M Gerber; Jacqueline Broerse; Ursula Gottweis; Abbi Hobbs; Ilpo Helén; Maria Paschou; Karoliina Snell; Alexandra Soulier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Structural requirements of research tissue banks derived from standardized project surveillance.

Authors:  E Herpel; N Koleganova; B Schreiber; B Walter; C V Kalle; P Schirmacher
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Genotype-phenotype databases: challenges and solutions for the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Gudmundur A Thorisson; Juha Muilu; Anthony J Brookes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  International guidelines on biobank research leave researchers in ambiguity: why is this so?

Authors:  Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg; Mats G Hansson; Kathinka Evers
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  The policies of ethics committees in the management of biobanks used for research: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Corinna Porteri; Elena Togni; Patrizio Pasqualetti
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Erisa Mwaka; Lyn Horn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.