Literature DB >> 30144005

Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.

Melissa A Simon1, Rodney Haring2, Elisa M Rodriguez2, Evelyn González3, Judith S Kaur4, Marcie Kirschner5, Laura Tom5, Catherine A O'Brian5, Mira L Katz6.   

Abstract

Racial/ethnic minorities are underrepresented in clinical research in the USA for multifarious reasons, including barriers to effective communication between researchers and potential research participants. To address the communication barriers between researchers and potential participants, we developed a Research Literacy Support (RLS) tool. The focus of this report is to present findings from the second and third phases of development that refined and assessed usability of the RLS tool. We utilized a mixed-methods approach that entailed iterative cognitive testing with participants (N = 52) from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds and interviews with clinical research recruiters (N = 20) to modify and refine the design and content of the RLS tool (phase 2). This was followed by assessment of the usability of the RLS tool by 100 participants (phase 3). During phase 2, participants provided feedback about layout, word choice, and comprehension of the tool. In phase 3, participants recognized that they had gained knowledge about clinical research from the RLS tool, although they still had a substantial learning gap after using the tool, indicating an opportunity for further refinement. The RLS tool may help advance health equity by addressing communication barriers that may impede minority participation in clinical research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biobanking; Cancer health disparities; Clinical research; Health equity; Research literacy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30144005      PMCID: PMC6934084          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  24 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.

Authors:  James Flory; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  "Tobacco has a purpose, not just a past": Feasibility of developing a culturally appropriate smoking cessation program for a pan-tribal native population.

Authors:  Christine Makosky Daley; Aimee S James; Randall S Barnoskie; Marcia Segraves; Ryan Schupbach; Won S Choi
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2006-12

3.  CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report - United States, 2013. Foreword.

Authors:  Thomas R Frieden
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2013-11-22

4.  The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented Populations.

Authors:  Samantha Torres; Erika E de la Riva; Laura S Tom; Marla L Clayman; Chirisse Taylor; Xinqi Dong; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  How to achieve informed consent for research from Spanish-speaking individuals with low literacy: a qualitative report.

Authors:  Dharma E Cortés; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Lori E Henault; Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

6.  Education level, primary language, and comprehension of the informed consent process.

Authors:  Peter E Breese; William J Burman; Stefan Goldberg; Stephen E Weis
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Using principles of health literacy to enhance the informed consent process.

Authors:  Bonne Lorenzen; Constance E Melby; Barb Earles
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.676

8.  Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer research.

Authors:  Julie H T Dang; Elisa M Rodriguez; John S Luque; Deborah O Erwin; Cathy D Meade; Moon S Chen
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-03-25

9.  Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse).

Authors:  Rodney C Haring; Whitney Ann Henry; Maui Hudson; Elisa M Rodriguez; Maile Taualii
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimens.

Authors:  Stacey A Page; Kiran Pohar Manhas; Daniel A Muruve
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  3 in total

1.  [DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 2) - Operationalisation and Measuring of Health Literacy from a Health Services Research Perspective].

Authors:  Stephanie Stock; Anna Isselhard; Saskia Jünger; Stefan Peters; Gundolf Schneider; Frederik Haarig; Sarah Halbach; Orkan Okan; Florian Fischer; Torsten Michael Bollweg; Ullrich Bauer; Doris Schaeffer; Dominique Vogt; Eva-Maria Berens; Nicole Ernstmann; Eva Maria Bitzer
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Co-producing Progression Criteria for Feasibility Studies: A Partnership between Patient Contributors, Clinicians and Researchers.

Authors:  Hannah M L Young; Samantha Goodliffe; Meeta Madhani; Kay Phelps; Emma Regen; Anthony Locke; James O Burton; Sally J Singh; Alice C Smith; Simon Conroy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.

Authors:  Melissa A Simon; Catherine A O'Brian; Laura Tom; Q Eileen Wafford; Shenita Mack; Samuel R Mendez; Magdalena Nava; Rabih Dahdouh; Rachelle Paul-Brutus; Kathryn H Carpenter; Barbara Kern; Kristi L Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.