Literature DB >> 23781802

The electrostatic response of water to neutral polar solutes: implications for continuum solvent modeling.

Hari S Muddana1, Neil V Sapra, Andrew T Fenley, Michael K Gilson.   

Abstract

Continuum solvation models are widely used to estimate the hydration free energies of small molecules and proteins, in applications ranging from drug design to protein engineering, and most such models are based on the approximation of a linear dielectric response by the solvent. We used explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations with the TIP3P water model to probe this linear response approximation in the case of neutral polar molecules, using miniature cucurbituril and cyclodextrin receptors and protein side-chain analogs as model systems. We observe supralinear electrostatic solvent responses, and this nonlinearity is found to result primarily from waters' being drawn closer and closer to the solutes with increased solute-solvent electrostatic interactions; i.e., from solute electrostriction. Dielectric saturation and changes in the water-water hydrogen bonding network, on the other hand, play little role. Thus, accounting for solute electrostriction may be a productive approach to improving the accuracy of continuum solvation models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23781802      PMCID: PMC3695974          DOI: 10.1063/1.4808376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  54 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems.

Authors:  Ray Luo; Laurent David; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Berk Hess; Carsten Kutzner; David van der Spoel; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Theory of electrostatic interactions in macromolecules.

Authors:  M K Gilson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; C Daniel Varnado; Christopher W Bielawski; Adam R Urbach; Lyle Isaacs; Matthew T Geballe; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  New ultrahigh affinity host-guest complexes of cucurbit[7]uril with bicyclo[2.2.2]octane and adamantane guests: thermodynamic analysis and evaluation of M2 affinity calculations.

Authors:  Sarvin Moghaddam; Cheng Yang; Mikhail Rekharsky; Young Ho Ko; Kimoon Kim; Yoshihisa Inoue; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  The cucurbit[n]uril family: prime components for self-sorting systems.

Authors:  Simin Liu; Christian Ruspic; Pritam Mukhopadhyay; Sriparna Chakrabarti; Peter Y Zavalij; Lyle Isaacs
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  The R.E.D. tools: advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building.

Authors:  François-Yves Dupradeau; Adrien Pigache; Thomas Zaffran; Corentin Savineau; Rodolphe Lelong; Nicolas Grivel; Dimitri Lelong; Wilfried Rosanski; Piotr Cieplak
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  On the Role of Dewetting Transitions in Host-Guest Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Kathleen E Rogers; Juan Manuel Ortiz-Sánchez; Riccardo Baron; Mikolai Fajer; César Augusto F de Oliveira; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Xiaodong Pang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Blind prediction of SAMPL4 cucurbit[7]uril binding affinities with the mining minima method.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Jian Yin; Neil V Sapra; Andrew T Fenley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  The SAMPL4 hydration challenge: evaluation of partial charge sets with explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Neil V Sapra; Andrew T Fenley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions.

Authors:  Nusret Duygu Yilmazer; Martin Korth
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Introducing Charge Hydration Asymmetry into the Generalized Born Model.

Authors:  Abhishek Mukhopadhyay; Boris H Aguilar; Igor S Tolokh; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Recent Progress in Treating Protein-Ligand Interactions with Quantum-Mechanical Methods.

Authors:  Nusret Duygu Yilmazer; Martin Korth
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.