Literature DB >> 24590428

Context-specific prospective-memory processing: evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding.

Beatrice G Kuhlmann1, Jan Rummel.   

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM) is remembering to fulfill intentions in the future. Interference of unfulfilled intentions with ongoing activities reflects the allocation of attention to the PM task. Prior research has shown that, when people know in which specific context PM cues will occur, attention allocation is adaptive, with slower responses in the PM-relevant context. We examined whether people flexibly adjust their attention allocation when the PM-context association is unknown at intention encoding and must be learned on-task. Different stimulus shapes represented contexts in an ongoing task, with PM cues only occurring in trials with one specific shape. Participants informed about the PM-relevant shape responded more slowly on trials with this shape. Participants instructed that only one, unspecified shape was PM-relevant learned the PM-context association and also allocated attention flexibly, depending on context relevance. However, participants with no context-related information at intention encoding failed to learn the PM-context association, resulting in inflexible attention allocation and poorer PM performance. The present study provides evidence that people can flexibly update their attention-allocation policy, and thereby optimize their PM performance after initial intention encoding, but self-guided learning of intention-context associations appears to be limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24590428     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0405-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Ute J Bayen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

4.  Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: the importance of associative cueing.

Authors:  Jessica Lang Nowinski; Key R Dismukes
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-08

5.  Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Gabriel I Cook; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

6.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

7.  Assessing the validity of multinomial models using extraneous variables: an application to prospective memory.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; C Dennis Boywitt; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory.

Authors:  C Dennis Boywitt; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

9.  Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Katherine White; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The specificity of prospective memory costs.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Evan Hirschhorn; Yoni Sobin; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-08-17
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  From retrospective to prospective memory research: a framework for investigating the deactivation of intentions.

Authors:  Patrícia Matos; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-03-10

2.  The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; B Hunter Ball
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

3.  The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory.

Authors:  Nicola Ballhausen; Katharina M Schnitzspahn; Sebastian S Horn; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

4.  Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

5.  Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Y Peeta Li; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

6.  A fresh pair of eyes on prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Eddie A Christopher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

7.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

8.  Prospective memory in context: Moving through a familiar space.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; R Reed Hunt; Amy E Murray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Too easy? The influence of task demands conveyed tacitly on prospective memory.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Johnathan H Hill; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions.

Authors:  Seth R Koslov; Arjun Mukerji; Katlyn R Hedgpeth; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.