Literature DB >> 23834056

Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.

Joana S Lourenço1, Katherine White, Elizabeth A Maylor.   

Abstract

Performing a nonfocal prospective memory (PM) task results in a cost to ongoing task processing, but the precise nature of the monitoring processes involved remains unclear. We investigated whether target context specification (i.e., explicitly associating the PM target with a subset of ongoing stimuli) can trigger trial-by-trial changes in task interference according to stimulus relevance for the nonfocal PM task. Participants performed a lexical decision task in which a PM task (press F6 when a target syllable appeared) was embedded. The target syllable always occurred in word trials, but we manipulated participants' expectations regarding the target context by instructing them that targets would occur in words only (specific condition) or in both words and nonwords (nonspecific condition). A control condition with no PM demands was also included. Although having a PM task led to noticeable slowing on the ongoing task, specifying the PM target context reduced cost to items irrelevant to the intention (nonwords) while leaving PM performance intact. Moreover, higher cost for nonwords in the nonspecific than specific condition was persistent across the ongoing task even though the target syllable was repeatedly presented in words. These results suggest that stimulus processing can be modulated according to participants' expectations about the lexical properties of the target, with trial-by-trial changes in task interference as a function of stimulus relevance to a nonfocal intention observed as a consequence. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23834056     DOI: 10.1037/a0033702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; B Hunter Ball
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

2.  Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Y Peeta Li; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

4.  Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing.

Authors:  Vanessa K Bowden; Rebekah E Smith; Shayne Loft
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Investigating the cost to ongoing tasks not associated with prospective memory task requirements.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Shayne Loft
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-04-26

6.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

7.  Prospective memory in context: Moving through a familiar space.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; R Reed Hunt; Amy E Murray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Too easy? The influence of task demands conveyed tacitly on prospective memory.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Johnathan H Hill; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Flexible attention allocation dynamically impacts incidental encoding in prospective memory.

Authors:  Juan D Guevara Pinto; Megan H Papesh; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-28

10.  Context-specific prospective-memory processing: evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding.

Authors:  Beatrice G Kuhlmann; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.