Literature DB >> 16131267

Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Gilles O Einstein1, Mark A McDaniel, Ruthann Thomas, Sara Mayfield, Hilary Shank, Nova Morrisette, Jennifer Breneiser.   

Abstract

Theoretically, prospective memory retrieval can be accomplished either by controlled monitoring of the environment for a target event or by a more reflexive process that spontaneously responds to the presence of a target event. These views were evaluated in Experiments 1-4 by examining whether performing a prospective memory task produced costs on the speed of performing the ongoing task. In Experiment 5, the authors directly tested for the existence of spontaneous retrieval. The results supported the multiprocess theory (M. A. McDaniel & G. O. Einstein, 2000) predictions that (a) spontaneous retrieval can occur and can support good prospective memory and (b) depending on task demands and individual differences, people rely to different degrees on monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval for prospective remembering. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16131267     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  110 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Prospective memory deficits in Ecstasy users: effects of longer ongoing task delay interval.

Authors:  Michael Weinborn; Steven Paul Woods; Claire Nulsen; Katherine Park
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Longer ongoing task delay intervals exacerbate prospective memory deficits in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND).

Authors:  Erin E Morgan; Erica Weber; Alexandra S Rooney; Igor Grant; Steven Paul Woods
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

5.  Cognitive exertion and subsequent intention execution in older adults.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Michael J Cahill; Janet S Singer; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

7.  Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Aliza Gordon; Alexander Jaudas; Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-28

8.  Resource depletion does not influence prospective memory in college students.

Authors:  Jill Talley Shelton; Michael J Cahill; Hillary G Mullet; Michael K Scullin; Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-09-08

9.  Prospective Memory Training: Outlining a New Approach.

Authors:  Emily R Waldum; Carolyn L Dufault; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  ERPs and their brain sources in perceptual and conceptual prospective memory tasks: Commonalities and differences between the two tasks.

Authors:  Gabriela Cruz; Makoto Miyakoshi; Scott Makeig; Kerry Kilborn; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.