Literature DB >> 29756806

Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

B Hunter Ball1, Julie M Bugg1.   

Abstract

Monitoring the environment for the occurrence of prospective memory (PM) targets is a resource-demanding process that produces cost to ongoing activities. The current study investigated younger and older adults' ability to monitor strategically, which involves the heightening and relaxation of monitoring when it is contextually appropriate thereby affording conservation of limited-capacity attentional resources. Participants performed a lexical-decision task in which words or nonwords were presented in upper or lower locations of the screen. The specific condition was correctly informed that PM targets ("tor" syllable) would occur only in word trials (simple cue; Experiment 1), in word trials in the upper location (complex cue; Experiments 2 and 3A), or in red trials in the upper location (complex cue; Experiment 3B), whereas the nonspecific condition was told that targets could appear in any context. The results showed that older adults generally exhibited similar monitoring patterns as younger adults. When context varied randomly on each trial, younger and older adults in the specific condition utilized simple (Experiment 1) but not complex (Experiment 2) contextual cues to reduce monitoring in unexpected contexts relative to the nonspecific condition. Notably, younger but not older adults were able to use the location dimension of the complex cue to reduce monitoring in unexpected (lower) contexts. When context varied more predictably (i.e., changed every eight trials), both younger and older adults were able to monitor strategically in response to the complex contextual cue (Experiments 3A and 3B). Together these findings suggest that context-sensitive PM monitoring processes generally remain intact with increased age. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29756806      PMCID: PMC5954997          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  52 in total

1.  Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; C Marshuetz; E E Smith; P A Reuter-Lorenz; R A Koeppe; A Hartley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

4.  Evidence for the sparing of reactive cognitive control with age.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-12-30

Review 5.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging.

Authors:  R L West
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; B Hunter Ball
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

8.  Does attention affect visual feature integration?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D E Presti; M I Posner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Michael Weinborn; Aimee Velnoweth; Alexandra Rooney; Romola S Bucks
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Katherine White; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  From retrospective to prospective memory research: a framework for investigating the deactivation of intentions.

Authors:  Patrícia Matos; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-03-10

2.  Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Y Peeta Li; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

3.  Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing.

Authors:  Vanessa K Bowden; Rebekah E Smith; Shayne Loft
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-08

4.  The effects of cognitive load and encoding modality on prospective memory.

Authors:  Guangzheng Li; Mei Li; Jin Wang; Zhanyu Yu; Hangjie Ma; Bing Li
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-03-27

5.  Effect of Encoding on Prospective Memory.

Authors:  Youzhen Chen; Manman Zhang; Cong Xin; Yunfei Guo; Qin Lin; Zhujun Ma; Jinhui Hu; Weiting Huang; Qianfang Liao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.