Literature DB >> 21755410

A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory.

C Dennis Boywitt1, Jan Rummel.   

Abstract

Holding an intention often interferes with other ongoing activities, indicating that resource-demanding processes are involved in maintaining the intention and noticing the appropriate event to fulfill it. Little is known, however, about the nature of the processes underlying this task interference effect. The goal of the present research was to decompose the processes contributing to the task interference effect by applying the diffusion model (Ratcliff, Psychological Review 85:59-108, 1978) to an event-based prospective memory task. In the first experiment, we validated the interpretation of the response criterion parameter (a) of the diffusion model as reflecting strategies to cope with the anticipated demands of a prospective memory task in the context of the ongoing task. The second experiment served to investigate which underlying processes contribute to the task interference often found with prospective memory tasks. Diffusion model analyses revealed that the task interference effect was due to (1) less efficient processing in the more demanding than in the less demanding prospective memory task and (2) a more conservative response criterion. We suggest that the anticipated demands and the additional processing demands of the prospective memory task jointly contribute to the task interference effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21755410     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0128-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

1.  Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; John A Reeder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

4.  Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jennifer E Breneiser; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

6.  Fast-dm: a free program for efficient diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Jochen Voss
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-11

7.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times.

Authors:  Joachim Vandekerckhove; Francis Tuerlinckx; Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-03

8.  Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

9.  Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance.

Authors:  Dawn M McBride; Jaclyn K Beckner; Drew H Abney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

10.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Carrie L Williford; Jason L Pagan; R Key Dismukes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-09
View more
  12 in total

1.  The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory.

Authors:  Nicola Ballhausen; Katharina M Schnitzspahn; Sebastian S Horn; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

2.  Investigating the cost to ongoing tasks not associated with prospective memory task requirements.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Shayne Loft
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-04-26

3.  Adult age differences in interference from a prospective-memory task: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian S Horn; Ute J Bayen; Rebekah E Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Slow drift rate predicts ADHD symptomology over and above executive dysfunction.

Authors:  Jason S Feldman; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Too easy? The influence of task demands conveyed tacitly on prospective memory.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Johnathan H Hill; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions.

Authors:  Seth R Koslov; Arjun Mukerji; Katlyn R Hedgpeth; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-11-07

8.  Context-specific prospective-memory processing: evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding.

Authors:  Beatrice G Kuhlmann; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

9.  Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods.

Authors:  Nina R Arnold; Arndt Bröder; Ute J Bayen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-04

10.  Model Complexity in Diffusion Modeling: Benefits of Making the Model More Parsimonious.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.