Literature DB >> 17489290

Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific.

Richard L Marsh1, Gabriel I Cook, Jason L Hicks.   

Abstract

Task interference occurs in prospective memory tasks when an intention deleteriously affects performance on an ongoing activity in some way. Several studies have shown that task interference can manifest itself in slower latencies to perform an ongoing task. Recent evidence demonstrates that associating intentions to certain performance contexts affects prospective memory performance (see, e.g., Cook, Marsh, & Hicks, 2005). In the present study, an intention was associated with a particular stimulus class, such as pictures or words. We found that task interference could be reduced when participants could reliably predict that the material about to be processed was irrelevant to the intention. This material-specific interference effect was found on a trial-by-trial basis in a random sequence of two different kinds of materials across two experiments and with blocking manipulation in another experiment. These results demonstrate that task interference is not a monolithic construct; rather, it results from dynamic and flexible attentional allocation strategies that can change on a trial-by-trial basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17489290     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Thomas W Hancock; Kirk Munsayac
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

2.  The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Thomas W Hancock; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Valerie Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

6.  Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: the importance of associative cueing.

Authors:  Jessica Lang Nowinski; Key R Dismukes
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-08

7.  On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Gabriel I Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Disruptions of preparatory attention contribute to failures of prospective memory.

Authors:  Robert West; Jason Krompinger; Ritvij Bowry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

9.  Comparing older and younger adults in an event-based prospective memory paradigm containing an output monitoring component.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Gabriel I Cook; Christopher B Mayhorn
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2007-03

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  21 in total

1.  Prospective memory: are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Aliza Gordon; Alexander Jaudas; Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  Learning is impaired by activated intentions.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Arlo Clark-Foos; J Thadeus Meeks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

4.  The influence of strategic monitoring on the neural correlates of prospective memory.

Authors:  Robert West
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

5.  Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebecca Kearney; Roger Remington
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

6.  Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks.

Authors:  J Thadeus Meeks; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-01-08

7.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory.

Authors:  C Dennis Boywitt; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

8.  The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; B Hunter Ball
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

9.  The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory.

Authors:  Nicola Ballhausen; Katharina M Schnitzspahn; Sebastian S Horn; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

10.  Prospective memory in an air traffic control simulation: external aids that signal when to act.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebekah E Smith; Adella Bhaskara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2011-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.