Literature DB >> 28275948

The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.

Julie M Bugg1, B Hunter Ball2.   

Abstract

Participants use simple contextual cues to reduce deployment of costly monitoring processes in contexts in which prospective memory (PM) targets are not expected. This study investigated whether this strategic monitoring pattern is observed in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues. Participants performed a lexical decision task in which words or nonwords were presented in upper or lower locations on screen. The specific condition was informed that PM targets ("tor" syllable) would occur only in words in the upper location, whereas the nonspecific condition was informed that targets could occur in any location or word type. Context was blocked such that word type and location changed every 8 trials. In Experiment 1, the specific condition used the complex contextual cue to reduce monitoring in unexpected contexts relative to the nonspecific condition. This pattern largely was not evidenced when the complex contextual cue was probabilistic (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 confirmed that strategic monitoring is observed for a complex cue that is deterministic, but not one that is probabilistic. Additionally, Experiments 1 and 3 demonstrated a disadvantage associated with strategic monitoring-namely, that the specific condition was less likely to respond to a PM target in an unexpected context. Experiment 3 provided evidence that this disadvantage is attributable to impaired noticing of the target. The novel findings suggest use of a complex contextual cue per se is not a boundary condition for the strategic, context-specific allocation of monitoring processes to support prospective remembering; however, strategic monitoring is constrained by the predictive utility of the complex contextual cue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Context specific; Probabilistic; Prospective memory; Strategic monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28275948     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0696-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to early processes in reading.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Evan F Risko; Nathan Sklair
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-06

3.  The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: location as a contextual cue.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; Zhiyu Gong; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues.

Authors:  Justin B Knight; J Thadeus Meeks; Richard L Marsh; Gabriel I Cook; Gene A Brewer; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Does attention affect visual feature integration?

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D E Presti; M I Posner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Katherine White; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Carrie L Williford; Jason L Pagan; R Key Dismukes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Y Peeta Li; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

3.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

4.  Context-Dependence and Context-Invariance in the Neural Coding of Intentional Action.

Authors:  David Wisniewski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.