Literature DB >> 24589403

Standardization and optimization of CT protocols to achieve low dose.

Sigal Trattner1, Gregory D N Pearson2, Cynthia Chin3, Dianna D Cody4, Rajiv Gupta5, Christopher P Hess3, Mannudeep K Kalra5, James M Kofler6, Mayil S Krishnam7, Andrew J Einstein1,2.   

Abstract

The increase in radiation exposure due to CT scans has been of growing concern in recent years. CT scanners differ in their capabilities, and various indications require unique protocols, but there remains room for standardization and optimization. In this paper, the authors summarize approaches to reduce dose, as discussed in lectures constituting the first session of the 2013 UCSF Virtual Symposium on Radiation Safety and Computed Tomography. The experience of scanning at low dose in different body regions, for both diagnostic and interventional CT procedures, is addressed. An essential primary step is justifying the medical need for each scan. General guiding principles for reducing dose include tailoring a scan to a patient, minimizing scan length, use of tube current modulation and minimizing tube current, minimizing tube potential, iterative reconstruction, and periodic review of CT studies. Organized efforts for standardization have been spearheaded by professional societies such as the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Finally, all team members should demonstrate an awareness of the importance of minimizing dose.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; justification; optimization; radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24589403      PMCID: PMC3969855          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  28 in total

1.  CT of pregnant women for urinary tract calculi, pulmonary thromboembolism, and acute appendicitis.

Authors:  David H Forsted; Carl L Kalbhen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Michael H Lev; Peter Bove; Cara E O'Reilly; Sanjay Saini; James T Rhea; James H Thrall; George J Hunter; Leena M Hamberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Comparison of effective doses for low-dose MDCT and radiographic examination of sinuses in children.

Authors:  T H Mulkens; C Broers; S Fieuws; J-L Termote; P Bellnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

5.  Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning.

Authors:  M Loubele; R Jacobs; F Maes; F Schutyser; D Debaveye; R Bogaerts; W Coudyzer; D Vandermeulen; J van Cleynenbreugel; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Impact of an automated multimodality point-of-order decision support tool on rates of appropriate testing and clinical decision making for individuals with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Jagat Narula; Leslee J Shaw; Heidi Gransar; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose.

Authors:  Jianhai Li; Unni K Udayasankar; Thomas L Toth; John Seamans; William C Small; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Leena M Hamberg; Michael A Blake; Jo-Anne Shepard; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section.

Authors:  Alice B Smith; William P Dillon; Benison C Lau; Robert Gould; Francis R Verdun; Edward B Lopez; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Balancing radiation dose and image quality: clinical applications of neck volume CT.

Authors:  M T Russell; J R Fink; F Rebeles; K Kanal; M Ramos; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  23 in total

1.  Ultra-low-dose periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: spot scanning and its potential for further dose reduction by replacing helical planning CT.

Authors:  Fabian Henry Jürgen Elsholtz; Lars-Arne Schaafs; Christoph Erxleben; Bernd Hamm; Stefan Markus Niehues
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: is iterative reconstruction software necessary to establish ultra-low-dose protocols? A quantitative and qualitative approach.

Authors:  Fabian Henry Jürgen Elsholtz; Lars-Arne Schaafs; Christoph Erxleben; Bernd Hamm; Stefan Markus Niehues
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  A report on the Academic Emergency Medicine 2015 consensus conference "Diagnostic imaging in the emergency department: a research agenda to optimize utilization".

Authors:  Martin L Gunn; Jennifer R Marin; Angela M Mills; Suzanne T Chong; Adam T Froemming; Jamlik O Johnson; Manickam Kumaravel; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-27

4.  Factors influencing cumulative radiation dose from percutaneous intra-abdominal abscess drainage in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Thomas J An; Azadeh Tabari; Michael S Gee; Colin J McCarthy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-25

5.  Comparison of a calcium phosphate bone substitute with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of fusion rates, clinical outcomes and complications with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Rhiannon M Parker; Gregory M Malham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  CT and MR Protocol Standardization Across a Large Health System: Providing a Consistent Radiologist, Patient, and Referring Provider Experience.

Authors:  Peter B Sachs; Kelly Hunt; Fabien Mansoubi; James Borgstede
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A Customizable Multimodality Imaging Compound That Relates External Landmarks to Internal Structures.

Authors:  Mulugeta Semework
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2015-09-03

8.  Ureteral Stones: Implementation of a Reduced-Dose CT Protocol in Patients in the Emergency Department with Moderate to High Likelihood of Calculi on the Basis of STONE Score.

Authors:  Christopher L Moore; Brock Daniels; Dinesh Singh; Seth Luty; Gowthaman Gunabushanam; Monica Ghita; Annette Molinaro; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Convolution-based estimation of organ dose in tube current modulated CT.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tian; W Paul Segars; Robert L Dixon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  CT angiography for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: investigation of a protocol by 20 ml of high-concentration contrast medium.

Authors:  Mario Silva; Gianluca Milanese; Rocco Cobelli; Carmelinda Manna; Edoardo Rasciti; Sara Poggesi; Nicola Sverzellati
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.