Literature DB >> 26943230

Ureteral Stones: Implementation of a Reduced-Dose CT Protocol in Patients in the Emergency Department with Moderate to High Likelihood of Calculi on the Basis of STONE Score.

Christopher L Moore1, Brock Daniels1, Dinesh Singh1, Seth Luty1, Gowthaman Gunabushanam1, Monica Ghita1, Annette Molinaro1, Cary P Gross1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine if a reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) protocol could effectively help to identify patients in the emergency department (ED) with moderate to high likelihood of calculi who would require urologic intervention within 90 days. Materials and Methods The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent with HIPAA authorization was obtained. This was a prospective, single-center study of patients in the ED with moderate to high likelihood of ureteral stone undergoing CT imaging. Objective likelihood of ureteral stone was determined by using the previously derived and validated STONE clinical prediction rule, which includes five elements: sex, timing, origin, nausea, and erythrocytes. All patients with high STONE score (STONE score, 10-13) underwent reduced-dose CT, while those with moderate likelihood of ureteral stone (moderate STONE score, 6-9) underwent reduced-dose CT or standard CT based on clinician discretion. Patients were followed to 90 days after initial imaging for clinical course and for the primary outcome of any intervention. Statistics are primarily descriptive and are reported as percentages, sensitivities, and specificities with 95% confidence intervals. Results There were 264 participants enrolled and 165 reduced-dose CTs performed; of these participants, 108 underwent reduced-dose CT alone with complete follow-up. Overall, 46 of 264 (17.4%) of patients underwent urologic intervention, and 25 of 108 (23.1%) patients who underwent reduced-dose CT underwent a urologic intervention; all were correctly diagnosed on the clinical report of the reduced-dose CT (sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval: 86.7%, 100%). The average dose-length product for all standard-dose CTs was 857 mGy · cm ± 395 compared with 101 mGy · cm ± 39 for all reduced-dose CTs (average dose reduction, 88.2%). There were five interventions for nonurologic causes, three of which were urgent and none of which were missed when reduced-dose CT was performed. Conclusion A CT protocol with over 85% dose reduction can be used in patients with moderate to high likelihood of ureteral stone to safely and effectively identify patients in the ED who will require urologic intervention. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943230      PMCID: PMC5341691          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Patient-centered Imaging.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tilo Niemann; Thilo Kollmann; Georg Bongartz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Trends in imaging use during the emergency department evaluation of flank pain.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Frederick K Korley; Julius C Pham; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Chandra Aubin; John Bailitz; Rimon N Bengiamin; Carlos A Camargo; Jill Corbo; Anthony J Dean; Ruth B Goldstein; Richard T Griffey; Gregory D Jay; Tarina L Kang; Dana R Kriesel; O John Ma; Michael Mallin; William Manson; Joy Melnikow; Diana L Miglioretti; Sara K Miller; Lisa D Mills; James R Miner; Michelle Moghadassi; Vicki E Noble; Gregory M Press; Marshall L Stoller; Victoria E Valencia; Jessica Wang; Ralph C Wang; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Radiation dose reduction in renal colic protocol CT: are we doing enough to ensure adoption of best practices?

Authors:  James A Brink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

Authors:  A Chabok; L Påhlman; F Hjern; S Haapaniemi; K Smedh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry.

Authors:  Adam Lukasiewicz; Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield; Laura Coombs; Monica Ghita; Jeffrey Weinreb; Gowthaman Gunabushanam; Christopher L Moore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prevalence and clinical importance of alternative causes of symptoms using a renal colic computed tomography protocol in patients with flank or back pain and absence of pyuria.

Authors:  Chris L Moore; Brock Daniels; Dinesh Singh; Seth Luty; Annette Molinaro
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Applications of justification and optimization in medical imaging: examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Paul R Sierzenski; Otha W Linton; E Stephen Amis; D Mark Courtney; Paul A Larson; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Robert A Novelline; Donald P Frush; Fred A Mettler; Julie K Timins; Thomas S Tenforde; John D Boice; James A Brink; Jerrold T Bushberg; David A Schauer
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States.

Authors:  Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul W Eggers; Paul L Kimmel; John W Kusek; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  8 in total

1.  Can excretory phase computed tomography predict bacteremia in obstructive calculous pyelonephritis?

Authors:  Yusuke Yagihashi; Shuichi Shimabukuro; Tomotune Toyosato; Yoshitaka Arakaki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Intra-patient comparison of reduced-dose model-based iterative reconstruction with standard-dose adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in the CT diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Sean Tenant; Chun Lap Pang; Prageeth Dissanayake; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Colin Stuckey; Catherine Gutteridge; Christopher Hyde; Carl Roobottom
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.

Authors:  Mahesh Desai; Yinghao Sun; Noor Buchholz; Andrew Fuller; Tadashi Matsuda; Brian Matlaga; Nicole Miller; Damien Bolton; Mohammad Alomar; Arvind Ganpule
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Update of the 2Sk guidelines on the diagnostics, treatment and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF register number 043-025) : What is new?]

Authors:  C Seitz; T Bach; M Bader; W Berg; T Knoll; A Neisius; C Netsch; M Nothacker; S Schmidt; M Schönthaler; R Siener; R Stein; M Straub; W Strohmaier; C Türk; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Renal Colic across a Sample of US Hospitals: High CT Utilization Despite Low Rates of Admission and Inpatient Urologic Intervention.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Penelope S Pekow; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Charles D Scales; Tara Lagu; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optical puncture combined with balloon dilation PCNL vs. conventional puncture dilation PCNL for kidney stones without hydronephrosis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mi Zhou; Xiang He; Yuelong Zhang; Weiwen Yu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Effect of obesity on ability to lower exposure for detection of low-attenuation liver lesions.

Authors:  Brian R Herts; Andrew Schreiner; Frank Dong; Andrew Primak; Jennifer Bullen; Wadih Karim; Douglas Nachand; Sara Hunter; Mark E Baker
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  What are the clinical effects of the different emergency department imaging options for suspected renal colic? A scoping review.

Authors:  Erik Doty; Stephen DiGiacomo; Bridget Gunn; Lauren Westafer; Elizabeth Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-06-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.