Literature DB >> 24567375

Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions.

Petr Havlík1, Hugo Valin, Mario Herrero, Michael Obersteiner, Erwin Schmid, Mariana C Rufino, Aline Mosnier, Philip K Thornton, Hannes Böttcher, Richard T Conant, Stefan Frank, Steffen Fritz, Sabine Fuss, Florian Kraxner, An Notenbaert.   

Abstract

Livestock are responsible for 12% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable intensification of livestock production systems might become a key climate mitigation technology. However, livestock production systems vary substantially, making the implementation of climate mitigation policies a formidable challenge. Here, we provide results from an economic model using a detailed and high-resolution representation of livestock production systems. We project that by 2030 autonomous transitions toward more efficient systems would decrease emissions by 736 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MtCO2e⋅y(-1)), mainly through avoided emissions from the conversion of 162 Mha of natural land. A moderate mitigation policy targeting emissions from both the agricultural and land-use change sectors with a carbon price of US$10 per tCO2e could lead to an abatement of 3,223 MtCO2e⋅y(-1). Livestock system transitions would contribute 21% of the total abatement, intra- and interregional relocation of livestock production another 40%, and all other mechanisms would add 39%. A comparable abatement of 3,068 MtCO2e⋅y(-1) could be achieved also with a policy targeting only emissions from land-use change. Stringent climate policies might lead to reductions in food availability of up to 200 kcal per capita per day globally. We find that mitigation policies targeting emissions from land-use change are 5 to 10 times more efficient--measured in "total abatement calorie cost"--than policies targeting emissions from livestock only. Thus, fostering transitions toward more productive livestock production systems in combination with climate policies targeting the land-use change appears to be the most efficient lever to deliver desirable climate and food availability outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deforestation; food security; marginal abatement cost; mathematical programming; productivity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24567375      PMCID: PMC3956143          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308044111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Agriculture. What next for agriculture after Durban?

Authors:  J R Beddington; M Asaduzzaman; M E Clark; A Fernández Bremauntz; M D Guillou; D J B Howlett; M M Jahn; E Lin; T Mamo; C Negra; C A Nobre; R J Scholes; N Van Bo; J Wakhungu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burney; Steven J Davis; David B Lobell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Livestock production and the global environment: consume less or produce better?

Authors:  Henning Steinfeld; Pierre Gerber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation.

Authors:  Georg Kindermann; Michael Obersteiner; Brent Sohngen; Jayant Sathaye; Kenneth Andrasko; Ewald Rametsteiner; Bernhard Schlamadinger; Sven Wunder; Robert Beach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems.

Authors:  Mario Herrero; Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; An Notenbaert; Mariana C Rufino; Philip K Thornton; Michael Blümmel; Franz Weiss; Delia Grace; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects.

Authors:  Philip K Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?

Authors:  Pete Smith; Helmut Haberl; Alexander Popp; Karl-Heinz Erb; Christian Lauk; Richard Harper; Francesco N Tubiello; Alexandre de Siqueira Pinto; Mostafa Jafari; Saran Sohi; Omar Masera; Hannes Böttcher; Göran Berndes; Mercedes Bustamante; Helal Ahammad; Harry Clark; Hongmin Dong; Elnour A Elsiddig; Cheikh Mbow; Nijavalli H Ravindranath; Charles W Rice; Carmenza Robledo Abad; Anna Romanovskaya; Frank Sperling; Mario Herrero; Joanna I House; Steven Rose
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Competition for land.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Peter J Gregory; Detlef van Vuuren; Michael Obersteiner; Petr Havlík; Mark Rounsevell; Jeremy Woods; Elke Stehfest; Jessica Bellarby
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  47 in total

1.  Diet: Food choices for health and planet.

Authors:  Elke Stehfest
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health.

Authors:  David Tilman; Michael Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Climate regulation, energy provisioning and water purification: Quantifying ecosystem service delivery of bioenergy willow grown on riparian buffer zones using life cycle assessment.

Authors:  David Styles; Pål Börjesson; Tina D'Hertefeldt; Klaus Birkhofer; Jens Dauber; Paul Adams; Sopan Patil; Tim Pagella; Lars B Pettersson; Philip Peck; Céline Vaneeckhaute; Håkan Rosenqvist
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Policy Perspective on the Role of Forest Sector Modeling.

Authors:  Sara Bushey Ohrel
Journal:  J For Econ       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy.

Authors:  David Leclère; Michael Obersteiner; Mike Barrett; Stuart H M Butchart; Abhishek Chaudhary; Adriana De Palma; Fabrice A J DeClerck; Moreno Di Marco; Jonathan C Doelman; Martina Dürauer; Robin Freeman; Michael Harfoot; Tomoko Hasegawa; Stefanie Hellweg; Jelle P Hilbers; Samantha L L Hill; Florian Humpenöder; Nancy Jennings; Tamás Krisztin; Georgina M Mace; Haruka Ohashi; Alexander Popp; Andy Purvis; Aafke M Schipper; Andrzej Tabeau; Hugo Valin; Hans van Meijl; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Piero Visconti; Rob Alkemade; Rosamunde Almond; Gill Bunting; Neil D Burgess; Sarah E Cornell; Fulvio Di Fulvio; Simon Ferrier; Steffen Fritz; Shinichiro Fujimori; Monique Grooten; Thomas Harwood; Petr Havlík; Mario Herrero; Andrew J Hoskins; Martin Jung; Tom Kram; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Tetsuya Matsui; Carsten Meyer; Deon Nel; Tim Newbold; Guido Schmidt-Traub; Elke Stehfest; Bernardo B N Strassburg; Detlef P van Vuuren; Chris Ware; James E M Watson; Wenchao Wu; Lucy Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosenzweig; Alex C Ruane; John Antle; Joshua Elliott; Muhammad Ashfaq; Ashfaq Ahmad Chatta; Frank Ewert; Christian Folberth; Ibrahima Hathie; Petr Havlik; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Dilys S MacCarthy; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Erik Mencos Contreras; Christoph Müller; Ignacio Perez-Dominguez; Meridel Phillips; Cheryl Porter; Rubi M Raymundo; Ronald D Sands; Carl-Friedrich Schleussner; Roberto O Valdivia; Hugo Valin; Keith Wiebe
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Uncovering the Research Gaps to Alleviate the Negative Impacts of Climate Change on Food Security: A Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahbaz Farooq; Muhammad Uzair; Ali Raza; Madiha Habib; Yinlong Xu; Muhammad Yousuf; Seung Hwan Yang; Muhammad Ramzan Khan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation.

Authors:  Avery S Cohn; Aline Mosnier; Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; Mario Herrero; Erwin Schmid; Michael O'Hare; Michael Obersteiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Long-term, multidomain analyses to identify the breed and allelic effects in MSTN-edited pigs to overcome lameness and sustainably improve nutritional meat production.

Authors:  Ziyao Fan; Zhiguo Liu; Kui Xu; Tianwen Wu; Jinxue Ruan; Xinmin Zheng; Shideng Bao; Yulian Mu; Tad Sonstegard; Kui Li
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 10.372

10.  Agriculture and forest land use change in the continental United States: Are there tipping points?

Authors:  Angelo C Gurgel; John Reilly; Elodie Blanc
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.