Literature DB >> 8567486

Methane emissions from cattle.

K A Johnson1, D E Johnson.   

Abstract

Increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane have led scientists to examine its sources of origin. Ruminant livestock can produce 250 to 500 L of methane per day. This level of production results in estimates of the contribution by cattle to global warming that may occur in the next 50 to 100 yr to be a little less than 2%. Many factors influence methane emissions from cattle and include the following: level of feed intake, type of carbohydrate in the diet, feed processing, addition of lipids or ionophores to the diet, and alterations in the ruminal microflora. Manipulation of these factors can reduce methane emissions from cattle. Many techniques exist to quantify methane emissions from individual or groups of animals. Enclosure techniques are precise but require trained animals and may limit animal movement. Isotopic and nonisotopic tracer techniques may also be used effectively. Prediction equations based on fermentation balance or feed characteristics have been used to estimate methane production. These equations are useful, but the assumptions and conditions that must be met for each equation limit their ability to accurately predict methane production. Methane production from groups of animals can be measured by mass balance, micrometeorological, or tracer methods. These techniques can measure methane emissions from animals in either indoor or outdoor enclosures. Use of these techniques and knowledge of the factors that impact methane production can result in the development of mitigation strategies to reduce methane losses by cattle. Implementation of these strategies should result in enhanced animal productivity and decreased contributions by cattle to the atmospheric methane budget.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8567486     DOI: 10.2527/1995.7382483x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  280 in total

1.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of the carbohydrate composition of feed concentratates on methane emission from dairy cows and their slurry.

Authors:  I K Hindrichsen; H R Wettstein; A Machmüller; B Jörg; M Kreuzer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Molecular diversity of the rumen microbiome of Norwegian reindeer on natural summer pasture.

Authors:  Monica A Sundset; Joan E Edwards; Yan Fen Cheng; Roberto S Senosiain; Maria N Fraile; Korinne S Northwood; Kirsti E Praesteng; Trine Glad; Svein D Mathiesen; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Estimates of animal methane emissions.

Authors:  D E Johnson; G M Ward
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  In vitro reduction of methane production by 3-nitro-1-propionic acid is dose-dependent1.

Authors:  Pedro Antonio Ochoa-García; Martha María Arevalos-Sánchez; Oscar Ruiz-Barrera; Robin C Anderson; Adrián Omar Maynez-Pérez; Felipe A Rodríguez-Almeida; América Chávez-Martínez; Héctor Gutiérrez-Bañuelos; Agustín Corral-Luna
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; Sinéad M Waters; Sinead M Waters; David A Kenny; Christopher J Creevey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of progressive inoculation of fauna-free sheep with holotrich protozoa and total-fauna on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity and methane emissions.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Gabriel de la Fuente; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  Assessment of reductive acetogenesis with indigenous ruminal bacterium populations and Acetitomaculum ruminis.

Authors:  T D Le Van; J A Robinson; J Ralph; R C Greening; W J Smolenski; J A Leedle; D M Schaefer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Enteric methane emissions by young Brahman bulls grazing tropical pastures at different rainfall seasons in the Peruvian jungle.

Authors:  Medardo Díaz-Céspedes; José Eduard Hernández-Guevara; Carlos Gómez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.559

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.