Literature DB >> 29610385

Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments.

Cynthia Rosenzweig1,2, Alex C Ruane3,2, John Antle4, Joshua Elliott5, Muhammad Ashfaq6, Ashfaq Ahmad Chatta6, Frank Ewert7,8, Christian Folberth9, Ibrahima Hathie10, Petr Havlik9, Gerrit Hoogenboom11, Hermann Lotze-Campen12,13, Dilys S MacCarthy14, Daniel Mason-D'Croz15,16, Erik Mencos Contreras3,2, Christoph Müller12, Ignacio Perez-Dominguez17, Meridel Phillips3,2, Cheryl Porter11, Rubi M Raymundo11, Ronald D Sands18, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner12,19, Roberto O Valdivia4, Hugo Valin9, Keith Wiebe15.   

Abstract

The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) has developed novel methods for Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments (CGRA) of agriculture and food security in a changing world. The present study aims to perform a proof of concept of the CGRA to demonstrate advantages and challenges of the proposed framework. This effort responds to the request by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for the implications of limiting global temperature increases to 1.5°C and 2.0°C above pre-industrial conditions. The protocols for the 1.5°C/2.0°C assessment establish explicit and testable linkages across disciplines and scales, connecting outputs and inputs from the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs), Representative Agricultural Pathways (RAPs), Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts (HAPPI) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) ensemble scenarios, global gridded crop models, global agricultural economics models, site-based crop models and within-country regional economics models. The CGRA consistently links disciplines, models and scales in order to track the complex chain of climate impacts and identify key vulnerabilities, feedbacks and uncertainties in managing future risk. CGRA proof-of-concept results show that, at the global scale, there are mixed areas of positive and negative simulated wheat and maize yield changes, with declines in some breadbasket regions, at both 1.5°C and 2.0°C. Declines are especially evident in simulations that do not take into account direct CO2 effects on crops. These projected global yield changes mostly resulted in increases in prices and areas of wheat and maize in two global economics models. Regional simulations for 1.5°C and 2.0°C using site-based crop models had mixed results depending on the region and the crop. In conjunction with price changes from the global economics models, productivity declines in the Punjab, Pakistan, resulted in an increase in vulnerable households and the poverty rate.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
© 2018 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1.5°C agricultural impacts; Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP); climate change; interdisciplinary; scales

Year:  2018        PMID: 29610385      PMCID: PMC5897826          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

Review 1.  A multi-biome gap in understanding of crop and ecosystem responses to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Andrew D B Leakey; Kristen A Bishop; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 7.834

2.  Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks.

Authors:  Gerald C Nelson; Hugo Valin; Ronald D Sands; Petr Havlík; Helal Ahammad; Delphine Deryng; Joshua Elliott; Shinichiro Fujimori; Tomoko Hasegawa; Edwina Heyhoe; Page Kyle; Martin Von Lampe; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Daniel Mason d'Croz; Hans van Meijl; Dominique van der Mensbrugghe; Christoph Müller; Alexander Popp; Richard Robertson; Sherman Robinson; Erwin Schmid; Christoph Schmitz; Andrzej Tabeau; Dirk Willenbockel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosenzweig; Joshua Elliott; Delphine Deryng; Alex C Ruane; Christoph Müller; Almut Arneth; Kenneth J Boote; Christian Folberth; Michael Glotter; Nikolay Khabarov; Kathleen Neumann; Franziska Piontek; Thomas A M Pugh; Erwin Schmid; Elke Stehfest; Hong Yang; James W Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.

Authors:  Richard H Moss; Jae A Edmonds; Kathy A Hibbard; Martin R Manning; Steven K Rose; Detlef P van Vuuren; Timothy R Carter; Seita Emori; Mikiko Kainuma; Tom Kram; Gerald A Meehl; John F B Mitchell; Nebojsa Nakicenovic; Keywan Riahi; Steven J Smith; Ronald J Stouffer; Allison M Thomson; John P Weyant; Thomas J Wilbanks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions.

Authors:  Petr Havlík; Hugo Valin; Mario Herrero; Michael Obersteiner; Erwin Schmid; Mariana C Rufino; Aline Mosnier; Philip K Thornton; Hannes Böttcher; Richard T Conant; Stefan Frank; Steffen Fritz; Sabine Fuss; Florian Kraxner; An Notenbaert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  New parsimonious simulation methods and tools to assess future food and environmental security of farm populations.

Authors:  John M Antle; Jetse J Stoorvogel; Roberto O Valdivia
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Crop responses to elevated CO2 and interactions with H2O, N, and temperature.

Authors:  Bruce A Kimball
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 7.834

8.  How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?

Authors:  Simona Bassu; Nadine Brisson; Jean-Louis Durand; Kenneth Boote; Jon Lizaso; James W Jones; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Alex C Ruane; Myriam Adam; Christian Baron; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Hendrik Boogaard; Sjaak Conijn; Marc Corbeels; Delphine Deryng; Giacomo De Sanctis; Sebastian Gayler; Patricio Grassini; Jerry Hatfield; Steven Hoek; Cesar Izaurralde; Raymond Jongschaap; Armen R Kemanian; K Christian Kersebaum; Soo-Hyung Kim; Naresh S Kumar; David Makowski; Christoph Müller; Claas Nendel; Eckart Priesack; Maria Virginia Pravia; Federico Sau; Iurii Shcherbak; Fulu Tao; Edmar Teixeira; Dennis Timlin; Katharina Waha
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions.

Authors:  Tao Li; Toshihiro Hasegawa; Xinyou Yin; Yan Zhu; Kenneth Boote; Myriam Adam; Simone Bregaglio; Samuel Buis; Roberto Confalonieri; Tamon Fumoto; Donald Gaydon; Manuel Marcaida; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Philippe Oriol; Alex C Ruane; Françoise Ruget; Balwinder- Singh; Upendra Singh; Liang Tang; Fulu Tao; Paul Wilkens; Hiroe Yoshida; Zhao Zhang; Bas Bouman
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO2 under a Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi-arid environment.

Authors:  Garry J O'Leary; Brendan Christy; James Nuttall; Neil Huth; Davide Cammarano; Claudio Stöckle; Bruno Basso; Iurii Shcherbak; Glenn Fitzgerald; Qunying Luo; Immaculada Farre-Codina; Jairo Palta; Senthold Asseng
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  8 in total

1.  Earth observations and integrative models in support of food and water security.

Authors:  Stephanie Schollaert Uz; Alex C Ruane; Bryan N Duncan; Compton J Tucker; George J Huffman; Iliana E Mladenova; Batu Osmanoglu; Thomas R H Holmes; Amy McNally; Christa Peters-Lidard; John D Bolten; Narendra Das; Matthew Rodell; Sean McCartney; Martha C Anderson; Brad Doorn
Journal:  Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  The myriad challenges of the Paris Agreement.

Authors:  Dann Mitchell; Myles R Allen; Jim W Hall; Benito Muller; Lavanya Rajamani; Corinne Le Quéré
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Using crop modeling to evaluate the impacts of climate change on wheat in southeastern turkey.

Authors:  Ömer Vanli; Burak Berk Ustundag; Ishfaq Ahmad; Ixchel M Hernandez-Ochoa; Gerrit Hoogenboom
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Climate change to severely impact West African basin scale irrigation in 2 °C and 1.5 °C global warming scenarios.

Authors:  Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla; Jeremy S Pal; Aissatou Faye; Kangbeni Dimobe; Harald Kunstmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Key determinants of global land-use projections.

Authors:  Elke Stehfest; Willem-Jan van Zeist; Hugo Valin; Petr Havlik; Alexander Popp; Page Kyle; Andrzej Tabeau; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Tomoko Hasegawa; Benjamin L Bodirsky; Katherine Calvin; Jonathan C Doelman; Shinichiro Fujimori; Florian Humpenöder; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Hans van Meijl; Keith Wiebe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Multi-target scenario discovery to plan for sustainable food and land systems in Australia.

Authors:  Javier Navarro Garcia; Raymundo Marcos-Martinez; Aline Mosnier; Guido Schmidt-Traub; Valeria Javalera Rincon; Michael Obersteiner; Katya Perez Guzman; Marcus J Thomson; Liviu Penescu; Clara Douzal; Brett A Bryan; Michalis Hadjikakou
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  The impact of 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C global warming on global maize production and trade.

Authors:  Kuo Li; Jie Pan; Wei Xiong; Wei Xie; Tariq Ali
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Biophysical and economic implications for agriculture of +1.5° and +2.0°C global warming using AgMIP Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments.

Authors:  Alex C Ruane; John Antle; Joshua Elliott; Christian Folberth; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Christoph Müller; Cheryl Porter; Meridel M Phillips; Rubi M Raymundo; Ronald Sands; Roberto O Valdivia; Jeffrey W White; Keith Wiebe; Cynthia Rosenzweig
Journal:  Clim Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.