Literature DB >> 24535628

Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.

Ya-Wen Hsiao1, Pär Söderhjelm.   

Abstract

Accurately predicting binding affinities between ligands and macromolecules has been a much sought-after goal. A tremendous amount of resources can be saved in the pharmaceutical industry through accurate binding-affinity prediction and hence correct decision-making for the drug discovery processes. Owing to the structural complexity of macromolecules, one of the issues in binding affinity prediction using molecular dynamics is the adequate sampling of the conformational space. Recently, the funnel metadynamics method (Limongelli et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:6358, 2013) was developed to enhance the sampling of the ligand at the binding site as well as in the solvated state, and offer the possibility to predict the absolute binding free energy. We apply funnel metadynamics to predict host-guest binding affinities for the cucurbit[7]uril host as part of the SAMPL4 blind challenge. Using total simulation times of 300-400 ns per ligand, we show that the errors due to inadequate sampling are below 1 kcal/mol. However, despite the large investment in terms of computational time, the results compared to experiment are not better than a random guess. As we obtain differences of up to 11 kcal/mol when switching between two commonly used force fields (with automatically generated parameters), we strongly believe that in the pursuit of accurate binding free energies a more careful force-field parametrization is needed to address this type of system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24535628     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9724-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  23 in total

1.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest binding affinities: evaluating the accuracy of generalized force-fields.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics.

Authors:  Francesco Luigi Gervasio; Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

Authors:  Gregory L Warren; C Webster Andrews; Anna-Maria Capelli; Brian Clarke; Judith LaLonde; Millard H Lambert; Mika Lindvall; Neysa Nevins; Simon F Semus; Stefan Senger; Giovanna Tedesco; Ian D Wall; James M Woolven; Catherine E Peishoff; Martha S Head
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method.

Authors:  Alessandro Barducci; Giovanni Bussi; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Exploring molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition by opioid receptors with metadynamics.

Authors:  Davide Provasi; Andrea Bortolato; Marta Filizola
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  12 in total

1.  Ligand binding free-energy calculations with funnel metadynamics.

Authors:  Stefano Raniolo; Vittorio Limongelli
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: I. Standard procedure.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Lei Zheng; Chu Qin; John Z H Zhang; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.179

5.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Computation of host-guest binding free energies with a new quantum mechanics based mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Tosaporn Sattasathuchana; Emilie Guidez; Simon P Webb; Kilinoelani Montgomery; Hussna Yasini; Iara F M Pedreira; Mark S Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Resolving the problem of trapped water in binding cavities: prediction of host-guest binding free energies in the SAMPL5 challenge by funnel metadynamics.

Authors:  Soumendranath Bhakat; Pär Söderhjelm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.