Literature DB >> 19785461

Exploring molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition by opioid receptors with metadynamics.

Davide Provasi1, Andrea Bortolato, Marta Filizola.   

Abstract

Opioid receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of utmost significance in the development of potent analgesic drugs for the treatment of severe pain. An accurate evaluation at the molecular level of the ligand binding pathways into these receptors may play a key role in the design of new molecules with more desirable properties and reduced side effects. The recent characterization of high-resolution X-ray crystal structures of non-rhodopsin GPCRs for diffusible hormones and neurotransmitters presents an unprecedented opportunity to build improved homology models of opioid receptors, and to study in more detail their molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition. In this study, possible pathways for entry of the nonselective antagonist naloxone (NLX) from the water environment into the well-accepted alkaloid binding pocket of a delta opioid receptor (DOR) molecular model based on the beta2-adrenergic receptor crystal structure are explored using microsecond-scale well-tempered metadynamics simulations. Using as collective variables distances that account for the position of NLX and of the receptor extracellular loop 2 in relation to the DOR binding pocket, we were able to distinguish between the different states visited by the ligand (i.e., docked, undocked, and metastable bound intermediates) and to predict a free energy of binding close to experimental values after correcting for possible drawbacks of the sampling approach. The strategy employed herein holds promise for its application to the docking of diverse ligands to the opioid receptors as well as to other GPCRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19785461      PMCID: PMC2764813          DOI: 10.1021/bi901494n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  44 in total

1.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

4.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility.

Authors:  Chu Wang; Philip Bradley; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications.

Authors:  L Toll; I P Berzetei-Gurske; W E Polgar; S R Brandt; I D Adapa; L Rodriguez; R W Schwartz; D Haggart; A O'Brien; A White; J M Kennedy; K Craymer; L Farrington; J S Auh
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1998-03

6.  Involvement of Trp-284, Val-296, and Val-297 of the human delta-opioid receptor in binding of delta-selective ligands.

Authors:  M Valiquette; H K Vu; S Y Yue; C Wahlestedt; P Walker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-02       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Functional role of a conserved motif in TM6 of the rat mu opioid receptor: constitutively active and inactive receptors result from substitutions of Thr6.34(279) with Lys and Asp.

Authors:  P Huang; J Li; C Chen; I Visiers; H Weinstein; L Y Liu-Chen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Naloxone activation of mu-opioid receptors mutated at a histidine residue lining the opioid binding cavity.

Authors:  C E Spivak; C L Beglan; B K Seidleck; L D Hirshbein; C J Blaschak; G R Uhl; C K Surratt
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Key residues defining the mu-opioid receptor binding pocket: a site-directed mutagenesis study.

Authors:  A Mansour; L P Taylor; J L Fine; R C Thompson; M T Hoversten; H I Mosberg; S J Watson; H Akil
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  Constitutive activation of the mu opioid receptor by mutation of D3.49(164), but not D3.32(147): D3.49(164) is critical for stabilization of the inactive form of the receptor and for its expression.

Authors:  J Li; P Huang; C Chen; J K de Riel; H Weinstein; L Y Liu-Chen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  39 in total

1.  Locating binding poses in protein-ligand systems using reconnaissance metadynamics.

Authors:  Pär Söderhjelm; Gareth A Tribello; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Investigating Small-Molecule Ligand Binding to G Protein-Coupled Receptors with Biased or Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Kristen A Marino; Marta Filizola
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

3.  Molecular motions in drug design: the coming age of the metadynamics method.

Authors:  Xevi Biarnés; Salvatore Bongarzone; Attilio Vittorio Vargiu; Paolo Carloni; Paolo Ruggerone
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Differential response to morphine of the oligomeric state of μ-opioid in the presence of δ-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Urszula Golebiewska; Jennifer M Johnston; Lakshmi Devi; Marta Filizola; Suzanne Scarlata
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Does the Lipid Bilayer Orchestrate Access and Binding of Ligands to Transmembrane Orthosteric/Allosteric Sites of G Protein-Coupled Receptors?

Authors:  Christopher T Szlenk; Jeevan B Gc; Senthil Natesan
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 6.  Mutagenesis computer experiments in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels: the role of simulation tools with different resolution.

Authors:  Alessandro Crnjar; Federico Comitani; Claudio Melis; Carla Molteni
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Hsiao; Pär Söderhjelm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation of Na+/K+-ATPase opens intracellular C-terminal water pathway leading to third Na+-binding site in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Hanne Poulsen; Poul Nissen; Ole G Mouritsen; Himanshu Khandelia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Showcasing modern molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins through G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Johnston; Marta Filizola
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.