Literature DB >> 22274835

Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest binding affinities: evaluating the accuracy of generalized force-fields.

Hari S Muddana1, Michael K Gilson.   

Abstract

We used the second-generation mining minima method (M2) to compute the binding affinities of the novel host-guest complexes in the SAMPL3 blind prediction challenge. The predictions were in poor agreement with experiment, and we conjectured that much of the error might derive from the force field, CHARMm with Vcharge charges. Repeating the calculations with other generalized force-fields led to no significant improvement, and we observed that the predicted affinities were highly sensitive to the choice of force-field. We therefore embarked on a systematic evaluation of a set of generalized force fields, based upon comparisons with PM6-DH2, a fast yet accurate semi-empirical quantum mechanics method. In particular, we compared gas-phase interaction energies and entropies for the host-guest complexes themselves, as well as for smaller chemical fragments derived from the same molecules. The mean deviations of the force field interaction energies from the quantum results were greater than 3 kcal/mol and 9 kcal/mol, for the fragments and host-guest systems respectively. We further evaluated the accuracy of force-fields for computing the vibrational entropies and found the mean errors to be greater than 4 kcal/mol. Given these errors in energy and entropy, it is not surprising in retrospect that the predicted binding affinities deviated from the experiment by several kcal/mol. These results emphasize the need for improvements in generalized force-fields and also highlight the importance of systematic evaluation of force-field parameters prior to evaluating different free-energy methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22274835      PMCID: PMC3383906          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9544-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  25 in total

1.  Fast assignment of accurate partial atomic charges: an electronegativity equalization method that accounts for alternate resonance forms.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Hillary S R Gilson; Michael J Potter
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Identification of symmetries in molecules and complexes.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Jing Huang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Enhancing the accuracy, the efficiency and the scope of free energy simulations.

Authors:  Tomas Rodinger; Régis Pomès
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

8.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 9.  Theory of free energy and entropy in noncovalent binding.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Hydrogen bonding and pi-stacking: how reliable are force fields? A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions.

Authors:  Robert S Paton; Jonathan M Goodman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  19 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Calculating the sensitivity and robustness of binding free energy calculations to force field parameters.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Calculation of Host-Guest Binding Affinities Using a Quantum-Mechanical Energy Model.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Hsiao; Pär Söderhjelm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Large scale affinity calculations of cyclodextrin host-guest complexes: Understanding the role of reorganization in the molecular recognition process.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Peng He; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  A blind SAMPL6 challenge: insight into the octanol-water partition coefficients of drug-like molecules via a DFT approach.

Authors:  Evrim Arslan; Basak K Findik; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Parameterization of an effective potential for protein-ligand binding from host-guest affinity data.

Authors:  Lauren Wickstrom; Nanjie Deng; Peng He; Ahmet Mentes; Crystal Nguyen; Michael K Gilson; Tom Kurtzman; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.137

10.  Limiting assumptions in molecular modeling: electrostatics.

Authors:  Garland R Marshall
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.