Literature DB >> 24532184

Augmentation of motor evoked potentials using multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery.

Shunji Tsutsui1, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Hiroshi Yamada, Hiroshi Hashizume, Akihito Minamide, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Hideto Nishi, Munehito Yoshida.   

Abstract

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are widely used to monitor motor function during spinal surgery. Improvements in transcranial stimulation techniques and general anesthesia have made it possible to record reliable and reproducible potentials. However, TcMEPs are much smaller in amplitude compared with compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by maximal peripheral nerve stimulation. In this study, multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation (mt-TES) was introduced to enhance TcMEPs, and the optimal setting of mt-TES was investigated. In 30 patients undergoing surgical correction of spinal deformities (4 males and 26 females with normal motor status; age range 11-75 years), TcMEPs from the abductor hallucis (AH) and quadriceps femoris (QF) were analyzed. A multipulse (train) stimulus with an individual pulse width of 0.5 ms and an inter-pulse interval of 2 ms was delivered repeatedly (2-7 times) at different rates (2, 5, and 10 Hz). TcMEP amplitudes increased with the number of train stimuli for AH, with the strongest facilitation observed at 5 Hz. The response amplitude increased 6.1 times on average compared with single-train transcranial electrical stimulation (st-TES). This trend was also observed in the QF. No adverse events (e.g., seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, scalp burns, accidental injury resulting from patient movement) were observed in any patients. Although several facilitative techniques using central or peripheral stimuli, preceding transcranial electrical stimulation, have been recently employed to augment TcMEPs during surgery, responses are still much smaller than CMAPs. Changing from conventional st-TES to mt-TES has potential to greatly enhance TcMEP responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532184     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-014-9565-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  29 in total

1.  Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kombos; O Suess; O Ciklatekerlio; M Brock
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Relationships between the changes in compound muscle action potentials and selective injuries to the spinal cord and spinal nerve roots.

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Tetsuya Tamaki; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Masanari Takami
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Utility of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative nerve root monitoring.

Authors:  David B Macdonald; Bent Stigsby; Iftetah Al Homoud; Tariq Abalkhail; Amal Mokeem
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Comparison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  S A Meylaerts; M J Jacobs; V van Iterson; P De Haan; C J Kalkman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Temporal summation--the key to motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in humans.

Authors:  B A Taylor; M E Fennelly; A Taylor; J Farrell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Warning thresholds on the basis of origin of amplitude changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyohei Sakaki; Shigenori Kawabata; Dai Ukegawa; Takashi Hirai; Senichi Ishii; Masaki Tomori; Hiroyuki Inose; Toshitaka Yoshii; Shoji Tomizawa; Tsuyoshi Kato; Kenichi Shinomiya; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The effects of propofol anesthesia on transcortical electric evoked potentials in the rat.

Authors:  B P Keller; S S Haghighi; J J Oro; G W Eggers
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials in children undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Franz J Frei; Sven E Ryhult; Ewald Duitmann; Carol C Hasler; Juerg Luetschg; Thomas O Erb
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Four-limb muscle motor evoked potential and optimized somatosensory evoked potential monitoring with decussation assessment: results in 206 thoracolumbar spine surgeries.

Authors:  David B Macdonald; Zayed Al Zayed; Abdulmoneam Al Saddigi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  I J Woodforth; R G Hicks; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: anesthesia.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Andre De Wolf; Stanley Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits.

Authors:  Shuta Ushio; Shigenori Kawabata; Satoshi Sumiya; Tsuyoshi Kato; Toshitaka Yoshii; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Feasibility of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Preventing Thermal Damage to the "Nerve at Risk" During Image-Guided Ablation of Tumors.

Authors:  Richard H Marshall; Edward K Avila; Stephen B Solomon; Joseph P Erinjeri; Majid Maybody
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve augments motor evoked potentials by re-exciting spinal anterior horn cells.

Authors:  Yusuke Yamamoto; Hideki Shigematsu; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hironobu Hayashi; Tsunenori Takatani; Masato Tanaka; Akinori Okuda; Sachiko Kawasaki; Keisuke Masuda; Yuma Suga; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Monophasic-Quadripulse Theta Burst Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Palsy Functional Evaluation After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Minoru Fujiki; Wataru Matsushita; Yukari Kawasaki; Hirotaka Fudaba
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 8.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring: Focusing on the Basic Knowledge of Orthopedic Spine Surgeon and Neurosurgeon as Members of a Team Performing Spine Surgery under Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Muneharu Ando; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Masanari Takami; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 9.  Basic Principles and Recent Trends of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Bipolar transesophageal thoracic spinal cord stimulation: A novel clinically relevant method for motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Ken Yamanaka; Kazumasa Tsuda; Daisuke Takahashi; Naoki Washiyama; Katsushi Yamashita; Norihiko Shiiya
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-08-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.