Literature DB >> 10615928

Comparison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

S A Meylaerts1, M J Jacobs, V van Iterson, P De Haan, C J Kalkman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare transcranial motor evoked potentials (tc-MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) as indicators of spinal cord function during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Somatosensory evoked potentials reflect conduction in dorsal columns. tc-MEPs represent anterior horn motor neuron function. This is the first study to compare the techniques directly during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
METHODS: In 38 patients, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (type I, n = 10, type II, n = 14, type III, n = 6, type IV, n = 8) was performed using left heart bypass and segmental artery reimplantation. tc-MEP amplitudes <25% and SSEP amplitudes <50% and/or latencies >110% were considered indicators of cord ischemia. The authors compared the response of both methods to interventions and correlated the responses at the end of surgery to neurologic outcomes.
RESULTS: Ischemic tc-MEP changes occurred in 18/38 patients and could be restored by segmental artery reperfusion (n = 12) or by increasing blood pressure (n = 6). Significant SSEP changes accompanied these tc-MEP events in only 5/18 patients, with a delay of 2 to 34 minutes. SSEPs recovered in only two patients. In another 11 patients, SSEP amplitudes fell progressively to <50% of control without parallel tc-MEP changes or association with cross-clamp events or pressure decreases. At the end of the procedure, tc-MEP amplitudes were 84 +/- 46% of control. In contrast, SSEP amplitudes were <50% of control in 15 patients (39%). No paraplegia occurred.
CONCLUSION: In all patients, tc-MEP events could be corrected by applying protective strategies. No patient awoke paraplegic. SSEPs showed delayed ischemia detection and a high rate of false-positive results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615928      PMCID: PMC1420937          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked myogenic potentials to detect spinal cord ischemia during operations for thoracoabdominal aneurysms.

Authors:  P de Haan; C J Kalkman; B A de Mol; L H Ubags; D J Veldman; M J Jacobs
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Dissociation of muscle action potentials and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials after ischemic damage of spinal cord.

Authors:  M Machida; S L Weinstein; T Yamada; J Kimura; S Toriyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A comparison of the sensitivity of epidural and myogenic transcranial motor-evoked responses in the detection of acute spinal cord ischemia in the rabbit.

Authors:  P de Haan; C J Kalkman; L H Ubags; M J Jacobs; J C Drummond
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The effects of aortic occlusion on transcranially induced evoked potentials in the dog.

Authors:  K H Kraus; E R Pope; D O'Brien; B L Hay
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.495

5.  Retrograde aortic and selective organ perfusion during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  M J Jacobs; B A de Mol; D A Legemate; D J Veldman; P de Haan; C J Kalkman
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Looking for the artery of Adamkiewicz: a quest to minimize paraplegia after operations for aneurysms of the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta.

Authors:  R B Griepp; M A Ergin; J D Galla; S Lansman; N Khan; C Quintana; J McCollough; C Bodian
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Intraoperative monitoring of tibialis anterior muscle motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation during partial neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  C J Kalkman; J C Drummond; N A Kennelly; P M Patel; B L Partridge
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Monitoring of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials under conditions of controlled neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  D C Adams; R G Emerson; E J Heyer; P C McCormick; P W Carmel; B M Stein; J P Farcy; E J Gallo
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Correlation of motor-evoked potential response to ischemic spinal cord damage.

Authors:  D G Reuter; W A Tacker; S F Badylak; W D Voorhees; P E Konrad
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  The risk of ischemic spinal cord injury in patients undergoing graft replacement for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  K Grabitz; W Sandmann; K Stühmeier; B Mainzer; E Godehardt; B Ohle; U Hartwich
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  14 in total

1.  Use of selective hypothermia to protect the spinal cord during resection of thoracoabdominal aneurysms.

Authors:  D A Cooley; B A Jones
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Is intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring valuable predicting postoperative neurological recovery?

Authors:  Y J Rho; S C Rhim; J K Kang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Transcranial motor-evoked potentials monitoring can detect spinal cord ischemia more rapidly than spinal cord-evoked potentials monitoring during aortic occlusion in rats.

Authors:  Manabu Kakinohana; Seiya Nakamura; Tatsuya Fuchigami; Kazuhiro Sugahara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Changes of motor evoked potentials during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Authors:  Masahide Shinzawa; Kenji Yoshitani; Kenji Minatoya; Tomoya Irie; Hitoshi Ogino; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Delayed response of transcranial myogenic motor-evoked potential monitoring to spinal cord ischemia during repair surgery for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Manabu Kakinohana; Masanori Abe; Yuji Miyata; Masakatsu Oshiro; Satoko Saikawa; Katsuya Arakaki; Yukio Kuniyoshi; Kazuhiro Sugahara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  [Epidural cooling. Neuroprotective treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms].

Authors:  J Tschöp; S Czerner; M Nuscheler; M Thiel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.