Literature DB >> 8615491

Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

I J Woodforth1, R G Hicks, M R Crawford, J P Stephen, D J Burke.   

Abstract

When recorded as a compound muscle action potential (CMAP), the motor-evoked potential (MEP) is affected by volatile anesthetics and nitrous oxide. However, MEPs recorded using epidural electrodes in the presence of nitrous oxide are highly reproducible from trial to trial. We wished to establish the reproducibility over time of the CMAP produced by supramaximal transcranial electrical stimulation of the human motor cortex. Cascades of 100 successive CMAPs were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscles of six anesthetized patients undergoing scoliosis surgery, in response to transcranial electrical stimuli of > 500 V. Satisfactory CMAPs could be recorded in the presence of nitrous oxide, but not isoflurane. Latencies and amplitudes were reproducible in repeated sequences of 100 responses. However, amplitude and, to a lesser extent, latency, were highly variable within a sequence. In addition, occasional individual stimuli, although rarely successive ones, failed to evoke a CMAP. CMAPs have a much higher trial-to-trial variability than corticospinal volleys recorded from the epidural space. Using the present methodology it would be difficult to rely on CMAP recordings as an indicator of corticospinal function in the clinical monitoring situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8615491     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199604000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  20 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative neurophysiology in posterior fossa tumor surgery in children.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Angela Coppola; Vincenzo Tramontano
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations.

Authors:  M R Weinzierl; P Reinacher; J M Gilsbach; V Rohde
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; Denise M Roth; Michel R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mixed-muscle electrode placement ("jumping" muscles) may produce false-negative results when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury in a porcine model.

Authors:  Russ Lyon; Shane Burch; Jeremy Lieberman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits.

Authors:  Shuta Ushio; Shigenori Kawabata; Satoshi Sumiya; Tsuyoshi Kato; Toshitaka Yoshii; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Statistical Model of Motor-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; S M Mahdi Alavi; Zhi-De Deng; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Anesthesia and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in children.

Authors:  Tod Sloan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Noninvasive model of sciatic nerve conduction in healthy and septic mice: reliability and normative data.

Authors:  Marcin F Osuchowski; James Teener; Daniel Remick
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.