Literature DB >> 28710663

A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits.

Shuta Ushio1,2, Shigenori Kawabata3,4, Satoshi Sumiya3, Tsuyoshi Kato3, Toshitaka Yoshii3, Tsuyoshi Yamada3, Mitsuhiro Enomoto3, Atsushi Okawa3.   

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the facilitation effect of repetitive multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation (mt-TES) at 2 repetition rates on transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) monitoring during spinal surgery, and to assess the induction rate in patients with impaired motor function from a compromised spinal cord or spinal nerve. We studied 32 consecutive patients with impaired motor function undergoing cervical or thoracic spinal surgery (470 muscles). A series of 10 TESs with 5 pulse trains were preoperatively delivered at 2 repetition rates (1 and 5 Hz). All peak-topeak amplitudes of the MEPs of the upper and lower extremity muscles elicited by the 10 TESs were measured. The induction rates of the lower extremity muscles were also assessed with muscle and preoperative lower extremity motor function scores. In each of the muscles, MEP amplitudes were augmented by about 2-3 times at 1 Hz and 5-6 times at 5 Hz. Under the 5-Hz condition, all limb muscles showed significant amplification. Also, in all preoperative motor function score groups, the amplitudes and induction rates of the lower extremity muscles were significantly increased. Moreover, the facilitation effects tended to peak in the last half of the series of 10 TESs. In all score groups of patients with preoperative neurological deficits, repetitive mt-TES delivered at a frequency of 5 Hz markedly facilitated the MEPs of all limb muscles and increased the induction rate. We recommend this method to improve the reliability of intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facilitation; Induction rate; Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; Motor function score; Spine surgery; Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28710663     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0045-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  30 in total

1.  Spatial facilitation of motor evoked responses in monitoring during spinal surgery.

Authors:  G Andersson; A Ohlin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Monitoring of motor action potentials after stimulation of the spinal cord.

Authors:  M Machida; S L Weinstein; T Yamada; J Kimura; T Itagaki; T Usui
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Temporal summation--the key to motor evoked potential spinal cord monitoring in humans.

Authors:  B A Taylor; M E Fennelly; A Taylor; J Farrell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: is it safe?

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Anthony K Sestokas; John P Dormans; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; John M Flynn; P Mark Li; Suken A Shah; William Welch; Denis S Drummond; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Transcranial electrical stimulation as predictor of elicitation of intraoperative muscle-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yuko Fukuoka; Hiromichi Komori; Shigenori Kawabata; Harunobu Ohkubo; Kiyoshi Mochida; Kenichi Shinomiya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia.

Authors:  U Pechstein; C Cedzich; J Nadstawek; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 7.  The effects of motor cortex rTMS on corticospinal descending activity.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Pilato; M Dileone; A Oliviero; U Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Arnaldo Benini; François Porchet; Alfred Mueller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Significant change or loss of intraoperative monitoring data: a 25-year experience in 12,375 spinal surgeries.

Authors:  Barry L Raynor; Joseph D Bright; Lawrence G Lenke; Raʼkerry K Rahman; Keith H Bridwell; K Daniel Riew; Jacob M Buchowski; Scott J Luhmann; Anne M Padberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  I J Woodforth; R G Hicks; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  1 in total

1.  Monophasic-Quadripulse Theta Burst Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Palsy Functional Evaluation After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Minoru Fujiki; Wataru Matsushita; Yukari Kawasaki; Hirotaka Fudaba
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.