Literature DB >> 27566473

Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Tsuyoshi Deguchi1, Shunji Tsutsui2, Hiroki Iwahashi1, Yukihiro Nakagawa1, Munehito Yoshida1.   

Abstract

Recently, low-frequency multi-train stimulation (MTS) was shown to effectively enhance transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs). In contrast, high- frequency double-train stimulation was reported to elicit a marked facilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of high-frequency MTS in the augmentation of potentials. In addition, we investigated the safety of high-frequency MTS, behaviorally and histologically. TcMEPs were recorded from the triceps surae muscle in 38 rats. A multipulse stimulus was delivered repeatedly at different rates (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 Hz), and was defined as MTS. A conditioned taste aversion method was used to investigate the effect of high-frequency MTS on learning and memory function. Subsequently, animals were sacrificed, and the brains were removed and examined using the standard hematoxylin-eosin method. Compared with conventional single train stimulation, TcMEP amplitudes increased 1.3, 2.1, 1.9, and 2.0 times on average with 5, 10, 20, and 50 Hz stimulation, respectively. The aversion index was >0.8 in all animals after they received 100 high-frequency MTSs. Histologically, no pathological changes were evident in the rat brains. High-frequency MTS shows potential to effectively enhance TcMEP responses, and to be used safely in transcranial brain stimulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-frequency electrical multi-train stimulation; Histology; Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring; Rat; Transcranial motor evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566473     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9930-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  29 in total

1.  Disynaptic pyramidal excitation in forelimb motoneurons mediated via C(3)-C(4) propriospinal neurons in the Macaca fuscata.

Authors:  B Alstermark; T Isa; Y Ohki; Y Saito
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex.

Authors:  T Kombos; O Suess; O Ciklatekerlio; M Brock
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  A neural model for conditioned taste aversions.

Authors:  K C Chambers
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

5.  Comparison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  S A Meylaerts; M J Jacobs; V van Iterson; P De Haan; C J Kalkman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Warning thresholds on the basis of origin of amplitude changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyohei Sakaki; Shigenori Kawabata; Dai Ukegawa; Takashi Hirai; Senichi Ishii; Masaki Tomori; Hiroyuki Inose; Toshitaka Yoshii; Shoji Tomizawa; Tsuyoshi Kato; Kenichi Shinomiya; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials in children undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Franz J Frei; Sven E Ryhult; Ewald Duitmann; Carol C Hasler; Juerg Luetschg; Thomas O Erb
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Four-limb muscle motor evoked potential and optimized somatosensory evoked potential monitoring with decussation assessment: results in 206 thoracolumbar spine surgeries.

Authors:  David B Macdonald; Zayed Al Zayed; Abdulmoneam Al Saddigi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Variability of motor-evoked potentials recorded during nitrous oxide anesthesia from the tibialis anterior muscle after transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  I J Woodforth; R G Hicks; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Memory for conditioned taste aversions is diminished by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J W Kling; M Yarita; T Yamamoto; Y Matsumiya
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2017 end of year summary: anesthesia.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Andre M De Wolf; Stanley Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.