Literature DB >> 30835023

Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Takuhei Kozaki1, Shunji Tsutsui2, Hiroshi Yamada1.   

Abstract

Nerve root injury can occur in complex spine surgeries. Recording transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) has been the most popular method to monitor motor function during surgery. However, TcMEPs cannot detect single nerve root injury satisfactorily. Recently, multi-train stimulation (MTS) was demonstrated to effectively enhance TcMEPs. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of TcMEPs elicited by MTS for intraoperative nerve root monitoring. TcMEPs were recorded from the quadriceps femoris (QF) and gastrocnemius (GC) muscles in the hindlimbs of 20 rats before and after transection of the nerve root at L6 (dominant root innervating the GC). For MTS, a multipulse (train) stimulus was delivered repeatedly at 5 Hz. The change ratio of the amplitude after transection of the nerve root was compared between MTS and conventional single-train stimulation (STS). The change in TcMEP amplitudes for QF after transection of the nerve root at L6 was 97.8 ± 12.2% with MTS and 100.1 ± 7.2% with STS (p = 0.496), whereas that for GC was 40.6 ± 11.5% with MTS and 64.8 ± 8.8% with STS (p < 0.001). MTS could improve the ability to detect isolated nerve root injury in intraoperative TcMEP monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative nerve root monitoring; Multi-train stimulation; Rat; Transcranial motor evoked potential

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30835023     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00296-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  28 in total

1.  Change of muscle motor-evoked potentials after motor cortex stimulation caused by acute spinal cord injury in cats.

Authors:  S Nakatoh; H Kitagawa; Y Kawaguchi; H Nakamura; H Takano
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-02

2.  Efficacy and limitations of current methods of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Hiroshi Iwasaki; Tetsuya Tamaki; Munehito Yoshida; Muneharu Ando; Hiroshi Yamada; Shunji Tsutsui; Masanari Takami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Segmental distribution of the motor neuron columns that supply the rat hindlimb: A muscle/motor neuron tract-tracing analysis targeting the motor end plates.

Authors:  R Mohan; A P Tosolini; R Morris
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Daniel K Resnick; Tanvir F Choudhri; Andrew T Dailey; Michael W Groff; Larry Khoo; Paul G Matz; Praveen Mummaneni; William C Watters; Jeffrey Wang; Beverly C Walters; Mark N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-06

5.  Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what's wrong with the "presence-or-absence" approach?

Authors:  Blair Calancie; Maria R Molano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Utility of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative nerve root monitoring.

Authors:  David B Macdonald; Bent Stigsby; Iftetah Al Homoud; Tariq Abalkhail; Amal Mokeem
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Continuous electromyographic monitoring to detect nerve root injury during thoracolumbar scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  N R Holland; J P Kostuik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Lumbar nerve root palsy after adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Dhruv B Pateder; John P Kostuik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Daniel M Schwartz; Venkat Sethuraman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.