Literature DB >> 11596955

Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex.

T Kombos1, O Suess, O Ciklatekerlio, M Brock.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The repetitive application of high-frequency anodal monopolar stimulation during surgery in or near the motor cortex allows a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Using this method, motor pathways and motor function can be continuously monitored during surgery.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 70 patients underwent MEP monitoring during surgery performed in the central region. All procedures were performed after general anesthesia had been induced without the aid of muscle relaxants. The motor pathways were monitored during the entire surgical procedure by repetitive high-frequency anodal monopolar stimulation (frequency 400-500 Hz; train 7-10 pulses; impulse duration 0.2-0.7 msec; and stimulation intensity 16.9 +/- 7.76 mA). The MEPs were continuously evaluated to assess their latency, potential duration, and amplitude. Recorded alterations in these parameters were subsequently correlated with surgical maneuvers and with postoperative neurological deterioration. The monitoring parameters (latency, potential duration, and amplitude) had a broad interindividual range of variation. A correlation between individual intraoperative changes in the potentials and surgical maneuvers or postoperative neurological deterioration was observed in eight cases. A spontaneous shift in latency greater than 15% or a sudden reduction in the amplitude of the potential greater than 80% was considered a warning criterion. In all cases in which there was an irreversible change in latency or a complete loss of potentials were observed, there was postoperative neurological deterioration.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved surgical safety can be achieved using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring procedures. Repetitive stimulation of the motor cortex proved to be a reliable method for monitoring subcortical motor pathways. Changes in MEP latency and MEP amplitude served as warning criteria during surgery and possessed prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11596955     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  36 in total

Review 1.  False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports.

Authors:  H Wiedemayer; I E Sandalcioglu; W Armbruster; J Regel; H Schaefer; D Stolke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations.

Authors:  M R Weinzierl; P Reinacher; J M Gilsbach; V Rohde
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Awake surgery between art and science. Part I: clinical and operative settings.

Authors:  Andrea Talacchi; Barbara Santini; Francesca Casagrande; Franco Alessandrini; Giada Zoccatelli; Giovanna M Squintani
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

4.  Is intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring valuable predicting postoperative neurological recovery?

Authors:  Y J Rho; S C Rhim; J K Kang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.

Authors:  James Drake; Reinhard Zeller; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Samuel Strantzas; Laura Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Technical principles in glioma surgery and preoperative considerations.

Authors:  Daria Krivosheya; Sujit S Prabhu; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  Takuhei Kozaki; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Deguchi; Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroki Iwahashi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Transzygomatic approach with intraoperative neuromonitoring for resection of middle cranial fossa tumors.

Authors:  Byung Chul Son; Sang Won Lee; Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong; Jae Hoon Sung; Seung-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.