Literature DB >> 24519619

Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty.

Jörg Lützner1, F-P Firmbach, C Lützner, J Dexel, S Kirschner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of an ultracongruent (UC) insert with a standard femoral component for substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is a bone-preserving and therefore interesting alternative to the established box and cam mechanism of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite the regular use of these UC inserts, there is little evidence about stability and range of motion (ROM).
METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability and ROM in standard cruciate-retaining (CR) and cruciate-substituting UC inserts of the same TKA. In 39 patients, intraoperative measurements of stability and ROM were taken (1) before soft tissue release and bone cuts, (2) after implantation of a CR TKA and (3) after resection of the PCL and substitution with an UC insert. All measurements were taken using a navigation system.
RESULTS: Stability measurements demonstrated no differences between CR (PCL intact) and UC TKA (PCL resected), but significantly increased anteroposterior translation at 60° and 90° of knee flexion compared with the preoperative condition. ROM measurements demonstrated improvement of knee flexion from preoperatively mean 105° (SD 14.1°) to intraoperative 120.2° (SD 6.7°) with the CR and 121.0° (SD 7.5°) with the UC insert and 113.5° (SD 14.0°) at the 1-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates similar stability of an UC insert compared with a standard CR insert. UC inserts are therefore a bone-preserving solution if the PCL needs to be substituted. ROM was not improved after resection of the PCL and substitution with the UC insert. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24519619     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2892-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  17 in total

1.  Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert.

Authors:  A A Hofmann; T K Tkach; C J Evanich; M P Camargo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  In vitro investigation of knee joint kinematics following cruciate retaining versus cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas Siebel; Wolfram Käfer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  Less femorotibial rotation and AP translation in deep-dished total knee arthroplasty. An intraoperative kinematic study using navigation.

Authors:  Philippe Massin; Patrick Boyer; Marc Sabourin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of total knee arthroplasty with highly congruent anterior-stabilized bearings versus a cruciate-retaining design.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Patrick Mulkey; Jill Erickson; Michael B Anderson; Christopher E Pelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases.

Authors:  J-N Argenson; S Boisgard; S Parratte; S Descamps; M Bercovy; P Bonnevialle; J-L Briard; J Brilhault; J Chouteau; R Nizard; D Saragaglia; E Servien
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Deep-dish congruent tibial component use in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  R S Laskin; Y Maruyama; M Villaneuva; R Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Intraoperative flexion against gravity as an indication of ultimate range of motion in individual cases after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D C Lee; D H Kim; R D Scott; K Suthers
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  F D Naal; F M Impellizzeri; M Sieverding; M Loibl; F von Knoch; A F Mannion; M Leunig; U Munzinger
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  16 in total

1.  Does cruciate retention primary total knee arthroplasty affect proprioception, strength and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Pieter-Jan T K Vandekerckhove; Roel Parys; Thomas Tampere; Patrick Linden; Luc Van den Daelen; Peter C Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Mean tensile strength of the PCL in TKA depends on the preservation of the tibial insertion site.

Authors:  N Van Opstal; H Feyen; J P Luyckx; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hagen Fritzsche; Franziska Beyer; Anne Postler; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting ultra-congruent insert.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Davide Deledda; Federica Rosso; Nicola Ratto; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

5.  Effect of polyethylene conformity on total knee arthroplasty early clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Indelli; Salvatore Risitano; Kimberly E Hall; Erika Leonardi; Eleonora Migliore
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Total knee arthroplasty using ultra-congruent inserts can provide similar stability and function compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoo Song; Hong-An Lim; Sang-Don Joo; Sung-Kyu Kim; Keun-Bae Lee; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kang Il Kim; Dong Hur; Hyun Ho Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Franziska Beyer; Julian Dexel; Hagen Fritzsche; Cornelia Lützner; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: How much of the PCL is really retained?

Authors:  Trifon Totlis; Michael Iosifidis; Ioannes Melas; Konstantinos Apostolidis; Alexios Agapidis; Nikolaos Eftychiakos; Dimitrios Alvanos; Anastasios Kyriakidis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Bae; Jung-Ro Yoon; Ju-Hyoung Sung; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.