Literature DB >> 22057354

Less femorotibial rotation and AP translation in deep-dished total knee arthroplasty. An intraoperative kinematic study using navigation.

Philippe Massin1, Patrick Boyer, Marc Sabourin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hyper-congruent inserts have been proposed as another means of posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty. Their kinematics, partially unexplored, is reported to be possibly erratic. The objectives of the present study were to detect whether prostheses with such a constrained design would provide antero-posterior (AP) stability without interfering with high flexion.
METHODS: The kinematics of 10 knees replaced with hyper-congruent inserts was tested intra-operatively with a specially designed navigation system (Praxim, La Tronche, Isère, France), to measure AP displacements of femoro-tibial contact points at knee flexion.
RESULTS: Femoro-tibial contact points in full extension were in a posterior position compared to their initial position before implantation (8 ± 6 mm medially, 15 ± 10 mm laterally, P < 0.004). AP displacements were different from pre-operative displacements (3 ± 4 mm vs -5 ± 2 mm for the medial condyle, P < 0.01 and -2 ± 6 mm vs -22 ± 8 mm for the lateral condyle, P < 0.001). Forward rolling persisted in four cases, with the medial condyle being involved in three of them (9, 9, and 6 mm, respectively). Post-operative flexion of 122° on average was not correlated with AP displacements.
CONCLUSIONS: Hyper-congruent prostheses partially stabilized femoral condyles at knee flexion. Posterior displacements were reduced with no consequence on range of flexion. Posterior stabilization was imperfect, and paradoxical displacements were detected by navigation, which could therefore help optimize knee balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057354     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1740-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Brian D Haas; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo knee kinematics in patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty of 2 designs.

Authors:  Nobukazu Okamoto; Leigh Breslauer; Anthony K Hedley; Hiroshi Mizuta; Scott A Banks
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Ephrat Most; Guoan Li; Peter G Sultan; Sang Eun Park; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA.

Authors:  Ephrat Most; Peter G Sultan; Sang Eun Park; Ramprasad Papannagari; Guoan Li
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Assessment of posterior stability in total knee replacement by stress radiographs: prospective comparison of two different types of mobile bearing implants.

Authors:  S Louisia; R Siebold; J Canty; R J Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Deep-dish congruent tibial component use in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  R S Laskin; Y Maruyama; M Villaneuva; R Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  In vivo flexion and kinematics of the knee after TKA: comparison of a conventional and a high flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design.

Authors:  Jeremy F Suggs; Young-Min Kwon; Sridhar M Durbhakula; George R Hanson; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  In vivo kneeling biomechanics after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  George R Hanson; Sang E Park; Jeremy F Suggs; Angela L Moynihan; Kyung W Nha; Andrew A Freiberg; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of knee flexion for a medial pivot knee.

Authors:  Pradeep Moonot; S Mu; G T Railton; R E Field; S A Banks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  A double deep-dish geometry.

Authors:  Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  17 in total

1.  Influence of the anterior-posterior femoral translation on the range of motion in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Yanagisawa; Naoki Sato; Takashi Ohsawa; Kenichi Saito; Masaki Shimizu; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Wolfgang Fitz; Ben Craiovan; Armin Keshmiri; Sebastian Winkler; Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Three different cruciate-sacrificing TKA designs: minor intraoperative kinematic differences and negligible clinical differences.

Authors:  Simone Bignozzi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Ibrahim Akkawi; Tedi Marko; Danilo Bruni; Maria Pia Neri; Francesca Colle; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Control of paradoxical kinematics in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty by increasing posterior femoral offset.

Authors:  J Donadio; A Pelissier; P Boyer; P Massin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Hans-Robert Springorum; Jürgen Götz; Jens Schaumburger; Christian Lüring; Joachim Grifka; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Deep-dished highly congruent tibial insert in CR-TKA does not prevent patellar tendon angle increase and patellar anterior translation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akkawi; Francesca Colle; Danilo Bruni; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Simone Bignozzi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Iacono; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; F-P Firmbach; C Lützner; J Dexel; S Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Jung-Won Lim; Young-Bong Ko; Min-Gu Song; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hagen Fritzsche; Franziska Beyer; Anne Postler; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Franziska Beyer; Julian Dexel; Hagen Fritzsche; Cornelia Lützner; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.