Literature DB >> 9726313

Intraoperative flexion against gravity as an indication of ultimate range of motion in individual cases after total knee arthroplasty.

D C Lee1, D H Kim, R D Scott, K Suthers.   

Abstract

To assess a method of predicting the final postoperative flexion in individual cases after total knee arthroplasty, 364 primary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties were reviewed retrospectively. The knees were subdivided into three preoperative flexion groups--I: poor motion (0 degrees to 85 degrees), II: intermediate motion (90 degrees to 110 degrees), and III: good motion (115 degrees to 140 degrees). There were 302 cases of osteoarthritis and 62 rheumatoid knees (12 juvenile rheumatoid). Correlation was made between preoperative; intraoperative, and postoperative (minimum 2-year follow-up) passive knee flexion for individuals. Intraoperative flexion against gravity was measured after capsular closure by passively flexing the patient's hip 90 degrees and allowing the weight of the lower leg to flex the knee joint. The overall mean value of postoperative flexion for all three groups was similar to preoperative and intraoperative flexion in both osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. In the poor motion group (I), postoperative flexion (103 degrees) was increased over preoperative flexion (84 degrees) but similar to intraoperative flexion (104 degrees). In the intermediate group (II), postoperative flexion (110 degrees) was similar to both the preoperative flexion (108 degrees) and intraoperative flexion (110 degrees). In the good group (III), postoperative flexion (119 degrees) tended to be less than preoperative flexion (123 degrees) and more than intraoperative flexion (116 degrees), but the differences were not statistically significant. When comparing preoperative and intraoperative flexion to postoperative flexion for individual cases, 55% of knees had postoperative flexion +/-10 degrees of their preoperative value, while 97% of knees had postoperative flexion +/-10 degrees of their intraoperative value. This study indicates that the final postoperative mean flexion for a group of patients with poor preoperative flexion (<85 degrees) and for individual cases (regardless of their preoperative mobility) can best be predicted by intraoperative flexion against gravity rather than by a preoperative value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9726313     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90047-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: is it for everybody?

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Andrea Baldini; Francesco Giron; Lorenzo Sensi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-02

2.  Prediction of range of motion 2 years after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: PCL-retaining versus PCL-sacrificing.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Mitsuhiro Takeda; Junko Sato; Shin-ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Dynamic knee behaviour: does the knee deformity change as it is flexed-an assessment and classification with computer navigation.

Authors:  Kamal Deep; Frederic Picard; Joseph Baines
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; F-P Firmbach; C Lützner; J Dexel; S Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hagen Fritzsche; Franziska Beyer; Anne Postler; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic treatment of patients with moderate arthrofibrosis after total knee replacement.

Authors:  Joerg Jerosch; Akram M Aldawoudy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision.

Authors:  I Jahromi; N P Walton; P J Dobson; P L Lewis; D G Campbell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature.

Authors:  A Kornuijt; D Das; T Sijbesma; L de Vries; W van der Weegen
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

9.  No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Franziska Beyer; Julian Dexel; Hagen Fritzsche; Cornelia Lützner; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The results of knee manipulation for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty with or without an intra-articular steroid injection.

Authors:  Vineet Sharma; Aditya V Maheshwari; Panagiotis G Tsailas; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.