PURPOSE: It remains unclear what the contribution of the PCL is in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of the PCL in TKA in relationship to clinical outcome, strength and proprioception. METHODS: Two arthroplasty designs were compared: a posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) and a posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. A retrospective analysis was performed of 27 CR and 18 PS implants with a minimum of 1 year in vivo. Both groups were compared in terms of clinical outcome (range of motion, visual analogue scale for pain, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scoring system, Lysholm score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), strength (Biodex System 3 Dynamometer(®)) and proprioception (balance and postural control using the Balance Master system(®)). Each design was also compared to the non-operated contralateral side in terms of strength and proprioception. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both designs in terms of clinical outcome and strength. In terms of proprioception, only the rhythmic weight test at slow and moderate speed shifting from left to right was significant in favour of the CR design. None of the unilateral stance tests showed any significant difference between both designs. There was no difference in terms of strength and proprioception between the operated side and the non-operated side. CONCLUSION: Retaining the PCL in TKA does not result in an improved performance in terms of clinical outcome and proprioception and does not show any difference in muscle strength. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: It remains unclear what the contribution of the PCL is in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of the PCL in TKA in relationship to clinical outcome, strength and proprioception. METHODS: Two arthroplasty designs were compared: a posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) and a posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. A retrospective analysis was performed of 27 CR and 18 PS implants with a minimum of 1 year in vivo. Both groups were compared in terms of clinical outcome (range of motion, visual analogue scale for pain, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scoring system, Lysholm score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), strength (Biodex System 3 Dynamometer(®)) and proprioception (balance and postural control using the Balance Master system(®)). Each design was also compared to the non-operated contralateral side in terms of strength and proprioception. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both designs in terms of clinical outcome and strength. In terms of proprioception, only the rhythmic weight test at slow and moderate speed shifting from left to right was significant in favour of the CR design. None of the unilateral stance tests showed any significant difference between both designs. There was no difference in terms of strength and proprioception between the operated side and the non-operated side. CONCLUSION: Retaining the PCL in TKA does not result in an improved performance in terms of clinical outcome and proprioception and does not show any difference in muscle strength. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: A A Bolanos; W A Colizza; P D McCann; R S Gotlin; M E Wootten; B A Kahn; J N Insall Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Byron E Chalidis; Nick P Sachinis; Pericles Papadopoulos; Evangelos Petsatodis; Anastasios G Christodoulou; George Petsatodis Journal: J Orthop Sci Date: 2011-09-10 Impact factor: 1.601
Authors: Juergen Götz; Johannes Beckmann; Ingo Sperrer; Clemens Baier; Silvia Dullien; Joachim Grifka; Franz Koeck Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Abderrahman Ouattas; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Nathaniel H Hunt; C Kent Boese; Brian A Knarr Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Marcelo Parente Oliveira; Roberto José Vieira DE Mello; Luciano Tavares Montenegro; Silvania Tavares Paz; Diego Ariel DE Lima; José Alberto Dias Leite Journal: Acta Ortop Bras Date: 2021 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 0.513