Literature DB >> 26733275

Intraoperative factors affecting conversion from cruciate retaining to cruciate substituting in total knee arthroplasty.

Dae Kyung Bae1, Sang Jun Song2, Kang Il Kim1, Dong Hur1, Hyun Ho Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse the factors affecting the conversion from posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-retaining (CR) to PCL-substituting (PS) prostheses during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: A total of 920 TKAs, which had been preoperatively planned to undergo implantation of CR-type prostheses, were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 83 knees (9.0 %) were converted intraoperatively to PS prostheses. The clinical and radiological factors of the non-converted (CR) and converted (PS) groups were compared. Clinically, age, gender, body mass index, angle of flexion contracture, size of the femoral component, and thickness of the polyethylene insert were compared between the CR and PS groups. Radiologically, the severity of the varus deformity and the posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) were compared between the CR and PS groups.
RESULTS: No significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, range of motion, thickness of the polyethylene insert, or severity of varus deformity were identified. The average preoperative angle of flexion contracture was 5.9° ± 7.4° in the CR group and 8.1° ± 9.1° in the PS group (p = 0.002). The average preoperative PSA was 9.6° ± 4.0° in the CR group and 11.0° ± 5.0° in the PS group (p = 0.018). The conversion rates to a PS-type femoral component of size C, D, and E were 13.1, 7.0, and 6.3 %, respectively (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The conversion rate from CR- to PS-type prostheses was high in patients with severe flexion contracture, steep posterior slope, and a small femoral component size. These factors should be carefully considered for appropriate selection of prosthesis type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion factor; Knee; PCL retaining; PCL substituting; TKA; TKR; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26733275     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3971-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  42 in total

1.  Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap.

Authors:  Y Kadoya; A Kobayashi; T Komatsu; S Nakagawa; Y Yamano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population.

Authors:  S V Vaidya; C S Ranawat; A Aroojis; N S Laud
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Gait analysis comparison of cruciate retaining and substituting TKA following PCL sacrifice.

Authors:  Siddharth Joglekar; Terence J Gioe; Patrick Yoon; Michael H Schwartz
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Trends in total knee arthroplasty implant utilization.

Authors:  Long-Co L Nguyen; Mandeep S Lehil; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study.

Authors:  C R Clark; C H Rorabeck; S MacDonald; D MacDonald; J Swafford; D Cleland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does a modified gap-balancing technique result in medial-pivot knee kinematics in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty? A pilot study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fitz; Sonal Sodha; William Reichmann; Tom Minas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Total knee arthroplasty ligament balancing and gap kinematics with posterior cruciate ligament retention and sacrifice.

Authors:  W M Mihalko; C Miller; K A Krackow
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2000-08

8.  Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a NexGen posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Yen-Shuo Chiu; Wei-Ming Chen; Ching-Kuei Huang; Chao-Ching Chiang; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Tibial internal rotation is affected by lateral laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative kinematic study using a navigation system and offset-type tensor.

Authors:  Tokio Matsuzaki; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Seiji Kubo; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Takehiko Matsushita; Yohei Kawakami; Kazunari Ishida; Shinya Oka; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The Surgeon's Role in Relative Success of PCL-Retaining and PCL-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; Kenneth E Davis; Alex Farris; E Michael Keating; Philip M Faris
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-05-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Se Gu Kang; Yeon Je Lee; Kang Il Kim; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Mid-term survivorship of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using modular mini-keel tibial implants.

Authors:  Cheng-Pang Yang; Kuo-Yao Hsu; Yu-Han Chang; Yi-Sheng Chan; Hsin-Nung Shih; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Preoperative Factors Predicting the Preservation of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Liyi Zhang; Jianhao Lin; Dan Xing; Qiang Liu; Diange Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.