| Literature DB >> 24517311 |
Ruiqiong Li1, Wayne K W Chou, Julie A Himmelberger, Kevin M Litwin, Golda G Harris, David E Cane, David W Christianson.
Abstract
The class IEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24517311 PMCID: PMC3985761 DOI: 10.1021/bi401643u
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochemistry ISSN: 0006-2960 Impact factor: 3.162
Figure 1(a) View of the hydrophobic EIZS active site in the wild-type EIZS–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex showing the locations of aromatic residues (red) and aliphatic residues (cyan) that largely define the active site contour shown in panel b. Portions of the protein structure in the foreground, including the α-helix containing W325, V329, and F332, are cut away to allow the active site to be viewed. Mg2+ ions are shown as magenta spheres. P and O atoms of the PPi anion are colored orange and red, respectively. C and N atoms of the BTAC cation are colored green and blue, respectively. The solvent-accessible surface area contributed by each residue is given in parentheses. Note that although A236 does not contribute to the solvent-accessible surface area in the wild-type enzyme, it is sufficiently close to the surface that substitution of larger side chains will impact the surface contour.
Mutagenic Primers Utilized To Generate EIZS Mutantsa
| mutation | F or R | 5′–3′ sequence |
|---|---|---|
| L72A | F | GTC TGT GCT ACA CGG ACg ctA TGG CGG GCT ACT ACC TG |
| R | CAG GTA GTA GCC CGC CAT agc GTC CGT GTA GCA CAG AC | |
| L72V | F | CTG TGC TAC ACG GAC gtg ATG GCG GGC TAC TAC |
| R | GTA GTA GCC CGC CAT cac GTC CGT GTA GCA CAG | |
| L72M | F | GTC TGT GCT ACA CGG ACa tgA TGG CGG GCT ACT ACC TG |
| R | CAG GTA GTA GCC CGC CAT cat GTC CGT GTA GCA CAG AC | |
| F95A | F | GAC TAC AGC GCG TGG gca TTC GTC TGG GAC GAC |
| R | GTC GTC CCA GAC GAA tgc CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC | |
| F95V | F | GAT AGC GGA CTA CAG CGC GTG Ggt tTT TGT CTG GGA CGA CCG TCA C |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC AAA aac CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC CGC TAT C | |
| F95M | F | GAT AGC GGA CTA CAG CGC GTG Gat gTT TGT CTG GGA CGA CCG TCA C |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC AAA cat CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC CGC TAT C | |
| F95H | F | GAT AGC GGA CTA CAG CGC GTG Gca tTT TGT CTG GGA CGA CCG TCA C |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC AAA atg CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC CGC TAT C | |
| F96V | F | GAT AGC GGA CTA CAG CGC GTG gtt CGT TGT CTG GGA CGA CCG TCA C |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC AAC GAA cca CGC GCT GTA GTC CGC TAT C | |
| F96L | F | GAC TAC AGC GCG TGG TTC tta GTC TGG GAC GAC CGT CAC |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC taa GAA CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC | |
| F96Y | F | GAT AGC GGA CTA CAG CGC GTG GTT Cta tGT CTG GGA CGA CCG TCA C |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC ata GAA CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC CGC TAT C | |
| F96W | F | GAC TAC AGC GCG TGG TTC tgg GTC TGG GAC GAC CGT CAC |
| R | GTG ACG GTC GTC CCA GAC cca GAA CCA CGC GCT GTA GTC | |
| F198V | F | GAA CTG CGC CGG CTC ACG gtt GCT CAC TGG ATC TGG AC |
| R | GTC CAG ATC CAG TGA GCa acC GTG AGC CGG CGC AGT TC | |
| F198L | F | CTC GAA CTG CGC CGG CTC ACG tta GCG CAC TGG ATC TGG ACC GAC |
| R | GTC GGT CCA GAT CCA GTG CGC taa CGT GAG CCG GCG CAG TTC GAG | |
| F198Y | F | GTA CCT CGA ACT GCG CCG GCT CAC Gta tGC ACA CTG GAT CTG GAC CGA C |
| R | GTC GGT CCA GAT CCA GTG TGC ata CGT GAG CCG GCG CAG TTC GAG GTA C | |
| A236G | F | GTC AGG AAT TCg gcG CCT GGT ACA AC |
| R | GTT GTA CCA GGC gcc GAA TTC CTG AC | |
| A236F | F | GCG TTG CTG AGT CAG GAA TTC ttt GCC TGG TAC AAC GAC CTC TGC |
| R | GCA GAG GTC GTT GTA CCA GGC aaa GAA TTC CTG ACT CAG CAA CGC | |
| A236M | F | GCG TTG CTG AGT CAG GAA TTC atg GCC TGG TAC AAC GAC CTC TGC |
| R | GCA GAG GTC GTT GTA CCA GGC cat GAA TTC CTG ACT CAG CAA CGC | |
| W325F | F | GGC AAT ATG CGG AAC TTC ttc AGT TCC GTC TAC TG |
| R | CAG TAG ACG GAA CTG AAg aaG TTC CGC ATA TTG CC | |
| V329A | F | CTG GTT CAG TTC Cgc gTA CTG GTT CCA CC |
| R | GGT GGA ACC AGT Acg cGG AAC TGA ACC AG | |
| V329G | F | CTG GTT CAG TTC Cgg tTA CTG GTT CCA CCA CGA GTC |
| R | GAC TCG TGG TGG AAC CAG TAa ccG GAA CTG AAC CAG | |
| V329I | F | CTG GTT CAG TTC Cat tTA CTG GTT CCA CCA CGA GTC |
| R | GAC TCG TGG TGG AAC CAG TAa atG GAA CTG AAC CAG | |
| V329M | F | CTG GTT CAG TTC Cat gTA CTG GTT CCA CCA CGA GTC |
| R | GAC TCG TGG TGG AAC CAG TAc atG GAA CTG AAC CAG | |
| F332A | F | CAG TTC CGT CTA CTG Ggc aCA CCA CGA GTC CGG C |
| R | GCC GGA CTC GTG GTG tgc CCA GTA GAC GGA ACT G |
Lowercase letters represent the introduced mutant codon.
F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.
X-ray Crystal Structure Data Collection and Refinement Statistics
| unliganded wild type | L72V–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex | F95M–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex | F95H–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex | A236G–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex | W325F–Mg2+3–PPi complex | V329A–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Collection | |||||||
| wavelength (Å) | 1.075 | 1.008 | 1.542 | 1.075 | 0.9795 | 0.9795 | 1.008 |
| resolution (Å) | 50–2.40 | 50–2.10 | 50–2.45 | 50–2.10 | 50–1.76 | 50–2.46 | 50–1.95 |
| no. of unique reflections | 13825 | 22011 | 13884 | 23067 | 37050 | 13755 | 26839 |
| completeness (%) | 95.8 (94.5) | 99.9 (99.2) | 99.9 (100.0) | 100.0 (100.0) | 99.2 (98.2) | 99.9 (99.9) | 97.3 (97.4) |
| redundancy | 3.1 (2.9) | 3.6 (3.5) | 4.4 (4.2) | 5.4 (5.4) | 3.3 (3.1) | 3.6 (3.4) | 4.2 (3.7) |
| 11.9 (2.4) | 12.2 (3.5) | 10.9 (3.5) | 11.9 (4.9) | 13.7 (2.7) | 7.6 (3.0) | 13.0 (3.0) | |
| 0.091 (0.335) | 0.104 (0.301) | 0.119 (0.400) | 0.136 (0.323) | 0.071 (0.339) | 0.148 (0.427) | 0.116 (0.432) | |
| Refinement | |||||||
| 0.191/0.250 | 0.173/0.206 | 0.185/0.224 | 0.160/0.204 | 0.164/0.198 | 0.182/0.231 | 0.152/0.201 | |
| rmsd | |||||||
| bonds (Å) | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| angles (deg) | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| dihedral angles (deg) | 17 | 13 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 17 |
| no. of protein atoms | 2577 | 2789 | 2778 | 2795 | 2804 | 2770 | 2812 |
| no. of solvent atoms | 53 | 241 | 80 | 268 | 283 | 47 | 376 |
| no. of Mg2+ cations | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| no. of PPi anions | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| no. of BTAC cations | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| no. of glycerols | 1 | 4 | 1 | ||||
| no. of SO42– anions | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| no. of HPO42– anions | 1 | ||||||
| Ramachandran plot (%) | |||||||
| most favored | 91.0 | 94.7 | 94.7 | 94.7 | 95.7 | 94.7 | 94.0 |
| additional allowed | 8.6 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| generously allowed | 0.4 | ||||||
| Protein Data Bank entry | 4LTV | 4LXW | 4LTZ | 4LZ3 | 4LZ0 | 4LZC | 4LUU |
Values in parentheses refer to data for the highest-resolution shell.
Rmerge = ∑|I – ⟨I⟩|/∑I, where ⟨I⟩ is the average intensity calculated from replicate reflections.
Rcryst = ∑||Fo| – |Fc||/∑|Fo| for reflections contained in the test set held aside during refinement. |Fo| and |Fc| are the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively.
Calculated with PROCHECK version 3.4.4.
Kinetic Parameters for Wild-Type and Mutant EIZS Enzymes
| enzyme | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 84 ± 1 | 330 ± 20 | 260000 ± 10000 |
| Aromatic Mutants | |||
| F95A | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 672 ± 2 | 2700 ± 300 |
| F95V | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 1700 ± 300 | 4400 ± 600 |
| F95M | 3.16 ± 0.09 | 275 ± 4 | 11500 ± 500 |
| F95H | 1.72 ± 0.02 | 650 ± 30 | 2600 ± 100 |
| F96A | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 800 ± 100 | 310 ± 60 |
| F96V | 1.15 ± 0.02 | 580 ± 30 | 199 ± 7 |
| F96L | 2.57 ± 0.02 | 820 ± 60 | 3100 ± 200 |
| F96Y | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 1800 ± 100 | 107 ± 2 |
| F96W | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 310 ± 70 | 1200 ± 400 |
| F198A | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 1200 ± 200 | 250 ± 50 |
| F198V | 1.66 ± 0.09 | 2800 ± 400 | 600 ± 60 |
| F198L | 4.75 ± 0.05 | 4200 ± 400 | 1100 ± 100 |
| F198Y | 15.04 ± 0.06 | 4100 ± 100 | 3600 ± 100 |
| W203F | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 1500 ± 200 | 230 ± 40 |
| W325F | 22 ± 2 | 160 ± 60 | 14000 ± 5000 |
| F332A | 0.105 ± 0.008 | 360 ± 90 | 290 ± 80 |
| Aliphatic Mutants | |||
| L72A | 8.81 ± 0.09 | 3000 ± 100 | 2900 ± 100 |
| L72V | 44 ± 3 | 600 ± 100 | 70000 ± 20000 |
| L72M | 11 ± 2 | 3200 ± 900 | 3400 ± 400 |
| A236G | 66 ± 2 | 450 ± 50 | 150000 ± 20000 |
| A236M | – | – | – |
| A236F | 0.0424 ± 0.0007 | 230 ± 50 | 190 ± 40 |
| V329A | 126 ± 7 | 470 ± 80 | 270000 ± 50000 |
| V329G | 19.8 ± 0.1 | 1590 ± 60 | 12500 ± 500 |
| V329I | 22.8 ± 0.3 | 770 ± 40 | 29000 ± 1000 |
| V329M | 0.640 ± 0.004 | 6500 ± 300 | 98 ± 3 |
Mutants previously reported (ref (13)).
Sesquiterpene Product Arrays Generated by EIZS Mutants
| relative average
percentage of sesquiterpene
products (product numbering shown in Figure | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| enzyme | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
| WT | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 79 | |||||||||||||
| WT | 1 | 1 | 5 | 93 | |||||||||||||||
| WT | 99 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| L72A | 6 | 6 | 13 | 67 | 8 (2) | ||||||||||||||
| L72V | 3 | 2 | 14 | 43 | 38 | ||||||||||||||
| L72M | 7 | 2 | 10 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
| F95A | 4 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 56 (3) | ||||||||||||||
| F95V | 26 | 2 | 66 | 6 (2) | |||||||||||||||
| F95M | 68 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
| F95H | 50 | 2 | 44 | 4 (2) | |||||||||||||||
| F96A | 70 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 (1) | ||||||||||||||
| F96V | 44 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 31 (1) | ||||||||||||||
| F96L | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 30 | 14 | 9 | 2 (1) | ||||||||
| F96Y | 3 | 1 | 18 | 78 | |||||||||||||||
| F96W | 9 | 65 | 3 | 23 (3) | |||||||||||||||
| F198A | 5 | 24 | 6 | 20 | 13 | 12 | 20 (3) | ||||||||||||
| F198V | 3 | 3 | 2 | 48 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 10 | 8 (3) | |||||||||
| F198L | 1 | 61 | 14 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
| F198Y | 89 | 5 (2) | |||||||||||||||||
| W203F | 6 | 47 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 21 (4) | |||||||||||||
| A236G | 2 | 70 | 28 (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| A236M | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| A236F | 8 | 15 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||
| W325F | 45 | 50 | 5 (3) | ||||||||||||||||
| V329A | 4 | 3 | 85 | 8 (1) | |||||||||||||||
| V329G | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 75 | |||||||||||||
| V329I | 2 | 98 | |||||||||||||||||
| V329M | 33 | 62 | 5 (1) | ||||||||||||||||
| F332A | 1 | 37 | 56 | 6 (3) | |||||||||||||||
N/A, not assigned; value in parentheses indicates the number of unknown products detected by GC–MS.
Product array reported in ref (13).
Assay conducted at 20 °C.
Assay conducted at 4 °C.
Figure 2Sesquiterpene products generated by EIZS mutants as detected by GC–MS analysis and identified by comparison of their individual mass spectra and chromatographic retention indices with those of authentic compounds in the MassFinder 4.0 Database.
Figure 3Biosynthetic manifold illustrating the proposed mechanism of FPP cyclization reactions catalyzed by EIZS and its site-specific mutants. The product numbering is identical to that in Figure 2. The predominant products of wild-type EIZS and certain EIZS mutants are highlighted in cyan and blue boxes, respectively, and side products are highlighted in yellow boxes; product percentages are listed in Table 4. For the sake of clarity, farnesene isomers 2 and 3 generated at low levels (1%) by wild-type EIZS are not shown, nor is acora-3,5-diene (14) generated at low levels (2%) by F95V EIZS. With regard to product stereochemistry, it should be noted that the determination of the absolute configuration of the (+)-epi-isozizaene produced by EIZS has been previously reported.[12] Although the absolute configurations of (+)-prezizaene (16) and (+)-zizaene (17) produced by EIZS mutants have not been directly determined,[14] they can be provisionally assigned from the natural cyclization mechanism, because they represent simple late-stage diversions of the pathway. By contrast, generation of both enantiomers of β-cedrene (12) has been directly determined for F198L EIZS by direct chiral GC–MS comparison with authentic standards, as described in the text. The formation of both (−)- and (+)-12 requires that EIZS or its mutants be capable of generating both the (7S)- and (7R)-homobisabolyl cations, as shown. The absolute configurations of the remaining aberrant sesquiterpene cyclization products have not been determined and are arbitrarily illustrated for (Z)-α-bisabolene (5), β-curcumene (6), sesquisabinene A (7), sesquiphellandrene (8), epi-β-santalene (9), epi-zonarene (10), (−)-α-cedrene (11), β-acoradiene (13), and helifolene (15). Formation of the enantiomers of any of these compounds can readily be accommodated by simple variations of the mechanistic scheme.
Figure 4Omit electron density map contoured at 2.2σ showing the conformation of F96 in the unliganded enzyme (dark blue), compared with the conformation of this residue in EIZS–ligand complexes as represented by the wild-type EIZS–Mg2+3–PPi–BTAC complex (light blue). Mg2+ ions are shown as magenta spheres. P and O atoms of the PPi anion are colored orange and red, respectively. C and N atoms of the BTAC cation are colored green and blue, respectively. Selected active site residues are labeled. The aromatic side chain of F96 undergoes a significant induced-fit conformational change as the terpenoid cyclase active site undergoes the transition from a fully open to a fully closed conformation.
Figure 5Superposition of wild-type (blue), L72V (cyan), F95M (green), F95H (magenta), A236G (orange), and V329A (red) EIZS complexed with three Mg2+3 ions, PPi, and BTAC, and W325F EIZS complexed with three Mg2+3 ions and PPi (tan).
Figure 6Model of the (7S)-homobisabolyl cation bound in the active site of wild-type EIZS, showing how the L72/W325/V329/F332 cluster could chaperone the precise conformation of the prenyl side chain that would generate the acorenyl cation leading to epi-isozizaene formation as summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 7D2 diesel fuel substitute bisabolane can be generated by the hydrogenation of (Z)-α-bisabolene or β-curcumene. F95H EIZS exhibits 68-fold enhanced catalytic efficiency in the generation of β-curcumene compared with the generation of (Z)-α-bisabolene by α-bisabolene synthase, so it is possible that F95H EIZS could serve as a superior terpenoid synthase for microbial biofuel generation.