We demonstrate the evolution of the PylRS/tRNA(CUA) pair for genetically encoding photocaged cysteine. By characterizing the incorporation in Escherichia coli and mammalian cells, and the photodeprotection process in vitro and in mammalian cells, we establish conditions for rapid efficient photodeprotection to reveal native proteins in live cells. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by rapidly activating TEV protease following illumination of single cells.
We demonstrate the evolution of the PylRS/tRNA(CUA) pair for genetically encoding photocaged cysteine. By characterizing the incorporation in Escherichia coli and mammalian cells, and the photodeprotection process in vitro and in mammalian cells, we establish conditions for rapid efficient photodeprotection to reveal native proteins in live cells. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by rapidly activating TEV protease following illumination of single cells.
Insight into dynamic processes
in cells and organisms would be facilitated by approaches to control
protein function with spatial and temporal precision. Rapid control
of protein function with light provides a promising route to perturb
processes more rapidly than most biological adaptations, providing
information that cannot be obtained by gene knockouts or knockdowns.
Several exciting strategies have emerged for the photocontrol of protein
function, including the control of protein localization or assembly
mediated by the genetic fusion of photoresponsive interaction domains
to target proteins (or their fragments), and the introduction of photocaged
amino acids in place of a key residue within a protein.[1−7]Strategies that photocage key residues within a target protein
have several advantages: (i) structural information and bioinformatics
can be used to reliably choose positions (e.g., key catalytic residues,
residues at a protein interface, or residues targeted for post-translational
modifications) where the introduction of a photocage will allow photocontrol;
and (ii) following illumination, the structure, function, activity
and localization of the resulting protein are entirely native.Proteins bearing photocaged amino acids have been synthesized by
chemical ligation and introduced into cells via microinjection, and
more recently synthesized directly in cells via genetic code expansion.
Photocaged lysine, tyrosine, and serine have been site specifically
incorporated in place of key residues, allowing photocontrol of nuclear
localization sequences, kinases, and other enzymes, and photocontrol
of the sites of post-translational modification.[2,4,8−11] These approaches have revealed
the kinetics, and feedback/feedforward contributions in elementary
steps of complex signaling pathways with high spatial and temporal
resolution.[1,4,8]Genetic incorporation
of photocaged cysteines in Escherichia coli (E. coli). (a) Chemical structures
of 1, 2, and 3. (b) sfGFP and
ubiquitin incorporating 1 or 2, overexpressed
in E. coli and Ni-NTA purified. (c)
ESI-MS demonstrates the incorporation of 1 into ubiquitin
in E. coli (A) observed: 9496.7 Da,
expected: 9497.6 Da). A second peak (B)
is consistent with nitro reduction of 1 to the corresponding
amine. ESI-MS analyses revealed no decaging of 1 after
10 min of illumination at 365 nm (∼35 mW/cm2). In
contrast, 2 is minimally reduced (peak C; observed: 9554.8
Da, expected: 9553.6 Da), and conversion of Ub-K6-2 to
Ub-K6C (peak F; observed: 9361.3 Da, expected: 9362.6 Da) after 1
min of illumination is quantitative. (D) corresponds to a reduced
species and (E) to a salt adduct (see Supporting
Information [SI], Figure S1a–d, for additional spectra
and analyses).Key cysteine residues
are found in many classes of proteins including:
phosphatases, ubiquitin ligases, cysteine proteases (including caspases
and deubiquitinases) and inteins. Cysteine residues are also the sites
of protein palmitoylation and form disulfide bonds in proteins. The
ability to (i) genetically encode the site-specific incorporation
of a photocaged cysteine residue into a target protein and (ii) rapidly
and cleanly convert the caged cysteine to cysteine upon illumination
of living cells would provide an important approach for controlling
diverse biological processes.The incorporation of an ortho-nitrobenzyl (ONB)
caged cysteine 1 has been reported in yeast using the Escherichia coli (E. coli) leucyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNACUA pair.[11] However, 1 has not been incorporated in other
host organisms. Moreover 70% deprotection of this amino acid in yeast
lysate required 20 min illumination with a hand-held UV lamp of unknown
spectral distribution and power, and photodecaging of this amino acid
has not been extended to living cells.The pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase
(PylRS)/tRNACUA pair
from methanogenic archaeal species, including Methanosarcina
barkeri (Mb), Methanosarcina
mazei (Mm) and their synthetically
evolved variants, have been used to direct the site-specific incorporation
of unnatural amino acids[12] into proteins
produced in E. coli, yeast, mammalian
cells, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Arabidopsis
thaliana.[13−18] Here we demonstrate the evolution of the PylRS/tRNACUA pair for genetically encoding photocaged cysteine. By carefully
characterizing the incorporation in E. coli and mammalian cells, and the photodeprotection process in
vitro and in mammalian cells, we establish conditions for
rapid near-quantitative photodeprotection to reveal native proteins
in live cells. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by rapidly
activating TEV protease following illumination of single cells.We initially evolved a synthetase/tRNACUA pair for 1 (Figure 1a). To evolve the orthogonal MbPylRS/tRNACUA pair for the site-specific incorporation
of 1, we created a library of MbPylRS
mutants in which five residues in the amino acid binding site (N311,
C313, V366, W382, and G386) were randomized to all possible natural
amino acids. We performed three rounds of alternating positive and
negative selection on the library in E. coli, as previously described.[17] Eighty out
of the 96 selected synthetase/tRNACUA pairs we screened
from the selection conferred survival on E. coli (bearing a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene with an amber
codon at position 112) on 350 μg/mL chloramphenicol in the presence
of 1 but did not confer survival on 50 μg/mL chloramphenicol
in the absence of 1. This suggests that the majority
of the selected synthetases are specific for the unnatural amino acid.
The majority of the selected clones had the mutations: N311M, C313Q,
V366G, W382N, and one nonprogrammed mutation, R85H. We named this
synthetase PCC1RS (SI, Table
S1). Production of full-length sfGFP from E. coli bearing sfGFP-N150TAG (A gene for superfolder GFP
with an amber codon at position 150) and the PCC1RS/tRNACUA pair was dependent on the addition of 1 (Figure 1b). Similarly, production of ubiquitin (Ub) from E. coli bearing UbK6TAG and the
PCC1RS/tRNACUA pair was dependent on the addition
of 1 (Figure 1b). SfGFP-N150-1 and Ub-K6-1 were produced in good yield (∼5
mg/L of culture). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS)
confirmed the genetically directed incorporation of 1 in recombinant proteins (Figure 1c and SI, Figure S1a), but also demonstrated that a
substantial portion of the protein contained a mass consistent with
reduction of the nitro group within the compound to an amine.
Figure 1
Genetic incorporation
of photocaged cysteines in Escherichia coli (E. coli). (a) Chemical structures
of 1, 2, and 3. (b) sfGFP and
ubiquitin incorporating 1 or 2, overexpressed
in E. coli and Ni-NTA purified. (c)
ESI-MS demonstrates the incorporation of 1 into ubiquitin
in E. coli (A) observed: 9496.7 Da,
expected: 9497.6 Da). A second peak (B)
is consistent with nitro reduction of 1 to the corresponding
amine. ESI-MS analyses revealed no decaging of 1 after
10 min of illumination at 365 nm (∼35 mW/cm2). In
contrast, 2 is minimally reduced (peak C; observed: 9554.8
Da, expected: 9553.6 Da), and conversion of Ub-K6-2 to
Ub-K6C (peak F; observed: 9361.3 Da, expected: 9362.6 Da) after 1
min of illumination is quantitative. (D) corresponds to a reduced
species and (E) to a salt adduct (see Supporting
Information [SI], Figure S1a–d, for additional spectra
and analyses).
Genetically
directed incorporation and photodecaging of 2 in mammalian
cells. (a) Immunoblotting of proteins from HEK293T
cells expressing mCherry-TAG-egfp-ha transfected
with MmPCC2RS-FLAG/tRNACUA pair in the presence or absence of 2 (5 mM). (b) SDS-PAGE
analysis confirmed the expression of sfGFP-N150-2 in
HEK293T cells in the presence of the MmPCC2RS/tRNACUA pair and 2. The full-length sfGFP
was purified by immunoprecipitation using an anti-GFP antibody. (c)
Efficient conversion of SfGFP-N150-2 (A; observed: 27921
Da, expected: 27922 Da) expressed and illuminated in live HEK293T
cells to SfGFP–N150-C (B; observed: 27729 Da, expected: 27728
Da) (See SI Figure S2b,c, for detailed
analyses).Following irradiation of Ub-K6-1 with 365 nm (∼35
mW/cm2) light for 10 min, the ONB caging group on ubiquitin
remained intact (Figure 1c and SI Figure S1c). While it is possible to remove
this group with shorter wavelengths, longer illumination or more powerful
illumination, we investigated the genetic encoding of a new photocaged
cysteine.We designed and synthesized a photocaged cysteine 2 that should be efficiently uncaged with nonphototoxic light
at 365
nm (Figure 1a; see SI for synthesis). The caging group in 2 can be efficiently
removed by illumination at 365 nm (as a result of the bathochromic
shift in the absorbance spectrum of the caging group).[19] The application of non-phototoxic light to decage 2 minimizes potential photoreactions of nucleic acids, destruction
of disulfides, and other cellular damage. Moreover, photolysis of 2 generates a ketone byproduct that will not undergo undesired
reactions with proteins.To evolve a synthetase for the incorporation
of 2,
we repeated the selection with 2, using the library used
to select the synthetase variant specific for 1. Out
of 96 clones from the final round of positive selection, screened
as described above, one conferred survival on 350 μg/mL chloramphenicol
in the presence of 2 but did not survive at 50 μg/mL
chloramphenicol in the absence of unnatural amino acid. The selected
synthetase contained three mutations in the active site: N311Q, C313A
and V366M, with respect to MbPylRS, and was named
PCC2RS. Expression of ubiquitin and sfGFP genes containing
an amber codon in the presence of PCC2RS/tRNACUA pair was efficient (∼4 mg/L of culture) and dependent on
the presence of 2 (Figure 1b).
ESI-MS confirmed the incorporation of 2 in ubiquitin
and sfGFP (Figure 1c). Ubiquitin containing 2 is quantitively decaged upon irradiation at 365 nm (∼35
mW/cm2) for 1 min (Figure 1c and SI, Figure S1d). Therefore, 2, unlike 1, is incorporated with minimal reduction in E. coli, and is quantitatively decaged. On the basis
of these advances we proceeded to investigate the genetic incorporation
of 2 into proteins in mammalian cells.Photocontrol of TEV protease
activity in mammalian cells. (a) Strategy
for photoactivating TEV protease. Caging a catalytic cysteine (C151)
in TEV protease deactivates it. TEV protease can be rapidly activated
by removing the caging group with light. (b) Site-specific incorporation
of 2 in TEV protease. Full-length TEV-C151-2 was expressed in HEK293T cells in the presence of 2 and the MmPCC2RS/tRNACUA pair. (c) TEV protease can be efficiently activated with light in
HEK293T cells. Cells were illuminated (1 min, 365 nm,∼4 mW/cm2). All cells contained the reporter of TEV protease activity.To demonstrate the genetically
directed site-specific incorporation
of 2 into a protein in mammalian cells, we introduced
the MmPCC2RS (a variant of MmPylRS containing the mutations discovered in MbPylRS
that direct the incorporation of 2)/tRNACUA pair into a human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cell line stably
expressing mCherry-TAG-eGFP-HA gene (a fusion between
the genes encoding a red fluorescent (mCherry) protein and a green
fluorescent protein (eGFP) and the human influenza hemagglutinin (HA)
tag separated by the amber codon (TAG)). Anti-HA immunobloting and
fluorescence microscopy confirmed that the expression of full-length
mCherry-eGFP-HA is dependent upon the addition of 2 (Figure 2a and SI, Figure S2a). The incorporation efficiency of 2 is
comparable to that of Nε-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-l-lysine 3, a good substrate for the PylRS/tRNACUA pair[18,20] (Figure 2a). To demonstrate the generality of this approach for incorporating 2 into proteins we expressed an sfGFP-N150TAG gene in HEK293T cells in the presence of the MmPCC2RS/tRNACUA pair and 2 and
purified the protein (Figure 2b). ESI-MS demonstrated
the genetically directed incorporation of 2 into sfGFP
(sfGFP-N150-2 (Figure 2b and SI Figure S2b) in mammalian cells without reduction.
Illumination of HEK293T cells expressing sfGFP-2 (1 min,
365 nm, ∼4 mW/cm2), followed by purification of
sfGFP and ESI-MS demonstrates the efficient conversion of 2 to cysteine in the protein (90% deprotection with 1/10th of the
power used for quantitative deprotection in vitro). This demonstrates that genetically encoded 2 can be
cleanly and efficiently decaged in proteins expressed in live mammalian
cells (Figure 2c and SI, Figure S2b,c).
Figure 2
Genetically
directed incorporation and photodecaging of 2 in mammalian
cells. (a) Immunoblotting of proteins from HEK293T
cells expressing mCherry-TAG-egfp-ha transfected
with MmPCC2RS-FLAG/tRNACUA pair in the presence or absence of 2 (5 mM). (b) SDS-PAGE
analysis confirmed the expression of sfGFP-N150-2 in
HEK293T cells in the presence of the MmPCC2RS/tRNACUA pair and 2. The full-length sfGFP
was purified by immunoprecipitation using an anti-GFP antibody. (c)
Efficient conversion of SfGFP-N150-2 (A; observed: 27921
Da, expected: 27922 Da) expressed and illuminated in live HEK293T
cells to SfGFP–N150-C (B; observed: 27729 Da, expected: 27728
Da) (See SI Figure S2b,c, for detailed
analyses).
To exemplify the photocontrol of protein function
in mammalian
cells via the genetically directed incorporation of 2 we replaced the catalytic cysteine (C151) in Tobacco Etch Virus
(TEV) protease. We synthesized TEV protease incorporating 2 (TEV-C151-2) in HEK293T cells, bearing TEV-C151-TAG
and the MmPCC2RS/tRNACUA pair
(Figure 3a,b).
Figure 3
Photocontrol of TEV protease
activity in mammalian cells. (a) Strategy
for photoactivating TEV protease. Caging a catalytic cysteine (C151)
in TEV protease deactivates it. TEV protease can be rapidly activated
by removing the caging group with light. (b) Site-specific incorporation
of 2 in TEV protease. Full-length TEV-C151-2 was expressed in HEK293T cells in the presence of 2 and the MmPCC2RS/tRNACUA pair. (c) TEV protease can be efficiently activated with light in
HEK293T cells. Cells were illuminated (1 min, 365 nm,∼4 mW/cm2). All cells contained the reporter of TEV protease activity.
To report on TEV protease
activity in cells we used an ECFP-TevS-YFP-V5
fusion protein containing a TEV cleavage site (TevS) at the linker
between ECFP (enhanced cyan fluorescent protein), YFP (yellow fluorescent
protein), and C-terminal V5 tag.[21] This
TEV protease sensor allows activity to be monitored by both western
blot and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET).Control
HEK293T cells expressing only the protease sensor produced
full-length fusion protein and a series of smaller V5 immunoreactive
species that may result from nonspecific proteolysis of the ECFP portion
of the reporter (Figure 3c, lanes 1, 5, 9 and
13). The addition of the wild-type TEV protease causes cleavage of
the TEV site in both the full-length sensor and the smaller V5 immunoreactive
species, resulting in the appearance of a single YFP-V5 immuno-responsive
cleavage product (Figure 3c: lanes 2, 6, 10,
14, and SI, Figure S3). No cleavage of
the sensor was observed when 2 or 3 was
incorporated into TEV protease in place of the catalytic cysteine,
demonstrating that this is sufficient to abrogate TEV protease activity
(Figure 3c: lanes 3 and 4). Upon illumination
(1 min, 365 nm, 4 mW/cm2) of cells bearing TEV-C151-2, we observe an increase in the YFP-V5 cleavage product resulting
from photoactivation of TEV-C151-2 to TEV protease (Figure 3c: lanes 4, 8, 12, 16). Illumination of control
cells expressing TEV-C151-3 did not result in cleavage
of the reporter, confirming the specificity of the approach (Figure 3c: lanes 3, 7, 11, 15). In these experiments the
extent of reporter cleavage following photoactivation is less than
with wild-type TEV protease, and this is in part because the experiment
is a three-plasmid transient transfection, and not all cells contain
the reporter, synthetase, tRNA, and TEV protease genes.We subsequently
monitored TEV protease activity over 4 h by FRET
fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FRET-FACS) (Figure 4 and SI, Figure S4a–f).
Control FRET-FACS experiments demonstrate that cells bearing the CFP-TevS-YFP
reporter show a high FRET signal, resulting from energy transfer from
CFP to YFP upon excitation of CFP (SI,
Figure S4). The FRET signal of the reporter is unchanged upon expression
of TEV-C151-2 or TEV-C151-3 from a construct
containing the TEV-C151-TAG gene separated by a self-cleaving
T2A sequence[22] from the mCherry gene allowing cells containing the construct to be marked with red
fluorescence.
Figure 4
Following TEV protease photoactivation by FRET in mammalian
cells.
(a) Histograms of FRET/CFP ratio in mCherry positive cells determined
by FRET-FACS. (b) Percentage of FREThi population, for
mCherry positive cells, at time points postillumination confirms rapid
TEV protease photoactivation. (See SI,
Figures S4a–f for detailed FACS analysis). (c) Single-cell
analysis of TEV protease photoactivation by live-cell fluorescent
imaging. Fluorescent confocal micrographs showing an increase in CFP/YFP
fluorescent intensity ratio after illumination in a representative
cell expressing FRET sensor and TEV-C151-2. (d) Analysis
of TEV protease activation in individual cells expressing the FRET
sensor and TEV-C151-2 or cells expressing only the FRET
sensor.
Following TEV protease photoactivation by FRET in mammalian
cells.
(a) Histograms of FRET/CFP ratio in mCherry positive cells determined
by FRET-FACS. (b) Percentage of FREThi population, for
mCherry positive cells, at time points postillumination confirms rapid
TEV protease photoactivation. (See SI,
Figures S4a–f for detailed FACS analysis). (c) Single-cell
analysis of TEV protease photoactivation by live-cell fluorescent
imaging. Fluorescent confocal micrographs showing an increase in CFP/YFP
fluorescent intensity ratio after illumination in a representative
cell expressing FRET sensor and TEV-C151-2. (d) Analysis
of TEV protease activation in individual cells expressing the FRET
sensor and TEV-C151-2 or cells expressing only the FRET
sensor.In cells bearing TEV-C151-2, and illuminated for 1
min, FRET-FACS analysis revealed a shift in the population from high
FRET (FREThi) to low FRET (FRETlo), indicating
a decrease in FRET (Figure 4a). This shift
occurred within 15 min following illumination, as revealed by the
drastic decrease in FREThi population over time (Figure 4b). In contrast, there was no change in the FREThi population over time for cells containing TEV-C151-3 and the FRET sensor or cells containing only the FRET sensor.
These results confirm that TEV protease can be activated and the FRET
sensor in most cells was efficiently cleaved within 15 min.Single-cell fluorescence microscopy allowed us to follow the activity
of TEV protease with greater temporal resolution in live cells (Figure 4c,d). Following photoactivation of TEV protease
the CFP/YFP ratio increases within 5 min, and approximately 80% of
the FRET sensor in cells is cleaved within 15 min. These results further
demonstrate the photoactivation of TEV protease in live cells.In summary, we have demonstrated the evolution of a pyrrolysyl-tRNA
synthetase/tRNACUA pair for the efficient site-specific
incorporation of 2 into proteins in E.
coli and mammalian cells, the efficient decaging of 2 in proteins expressed in E. coli and in mammalian cells and the rapid photoactivation of TEV protease
in mammalian cells. By combining the approach reported here with the
introduction of TEV sites into proteins of interest it will be possible
to create spatially and temporally controlled optically activated
protein knockouts. Extending this approach to animals and combining
it with emerging genome-editing approaches will allow rapid cell-specific
and developmental stage specific photoactivated protein knockouts.
We anticipate that this well characterized system for photocontrol
of cysteine residues in proteins will form the basis of powerful approaches
for rapidly controlling diverse biological processes.
Authors: Alexander Deiters; Dan Groff; Youngha Ryu; Jianming Xie; Peter G Schultz Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2006-04-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Peng R Chen; Dan Groff; Jiantao Guo; Weijia Ou; Susan Cellitti; Bernhard H Geierstanger; Peter G Schultz Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2009 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Edward A Lemke; Daniel Summerer; Bernhard H Geierstanger; Scott M Brittain; Peter G Schultz Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2007-10-28 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Matthew J Kennedy; Robert M Hughes; Leslie A Peteya; Joel W Schwartz; Michael D Ehlers; Chandra L Tucker Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-10-31 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Yi I Wu; Daniel Frey; Oana I Lungu; Angelika Jaehrig; Ilme Schlichting; Brian Kuhlman; Klaus M Hahn Journal: Nature Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Pamela T Wong; Shengzhuang Tang; Jayme Cannon; Jhindan Mukherjee; Danielle Isham; Kristina Gam; Michael Payne; Sean A Yanik; James R Baker; Seok Ki Choi Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Vishnu V Krishnamurthy; Aurora J Turgeon; John S Khamo; Payel Mondal; Savanna R Sharum; Wenyan Mei; Jing Yang; Kai Zhang Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 1.355